Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that I think about it a little more, we should probably always
> exit if setsid() fails.
That sounds good. The only instance I can see setsid(2) legitimately
failing other than OS resource exhaustion or something is when you
invoke httpd -F interac
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think we should just fail with an error if the user wished to start
> up under daemontools mode (no_detach mode) but somehow started httpd
> as a process group leader.
Concur.
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 03:15:44PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
the last eleven versions and would demonstratably simplify the
lives of sysadmins who gratefully run your package at many, many
sites.
What high-volume sites is 2.0 running on other than daedalus and
icarus?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (michael handler) washington, dc
Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to get the NetWare log rotation module checked in. I
> should have it in fairly quickly.
I thought no new features were going into the 1.3.* tree?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (michael handler) washington, dc
the mainline of the distribution (rsync and
SAMBA come to mind as two recent examples). The 1.3.* Apache tree
is the final outlier in this regard in my common set of UNIX server
applications, and it would save many people work in the future to
have this integrated into the next 1.3.* release.
for all of your time and hard work. --michael
patch attached, also available at:
http://www.sub-rosa.com/handler/pub/apache-1.3.23-foreground-patch
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (michael handler) washington, dc
--- http_main.c.distThu Feb 21 16:57:02 2002
+++ h
e as ``no interest, go away''.
>
> Thanks for the original patch! I just committed the last chunk from
> the patch I posted last week, so we should be good to go.
>
> -aaron
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (michael handler) washington, dc
--- http_main.c
chael
[1] Stevens, _Unix Network Programming, Volume One_ (2nd Edition),
pp 335: "We first call fork(2) and then the parent terminates and the
child continues. [...] Also, the child inherits the process group
ID from the parent but gets its own process ID. This guarantees
that the child is no
the bad line-wrap in the PR.)
http://bugs.apache.org/index.cgi/full/9341
Thanks for your consideration!
--michael
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (michael handler) washington, dc
h regarding this issue for 1.3.22 earlier today,
in which I also noted 2.0's issue with setsid(2) regarding this.
(Sorry for the bad line-wrap in the PR.)
http://bugs.apache.org/index.cgi/full/9341
Thanks for your consideration!
--michael
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (michael handler) washington, dc
10 matches
Mail list logo
