two of our
> production servers.
> I will have to wait until the mod_include patch is considered
> ready for
> release (production) in the 2.0 branch before I would
> consider upgrading
> and doing a production test.
>
> Regards,
>
> Glenn
>
> André
; -Original Message-
> From: Ron Park [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:09 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: mod_include: YABU (yet another bug uncovered)
>
>
> Hi Again,
>
> Well, we've come across another mod_inclu
Hi Again,
Well, we've come across another mod_include/cross brigade bug for which we
currently don't yet have a patch (should have one soon but thought I'd give
others a crack at it). :D
Here are two simple snippets, one which works, one which causes a core
dump even with the latest patch of mod_
t: Monday, July 21, 2003 5:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Ron Park
> Subject: RE: Two mod_include problems
>
>
>
>
> It actually had:
> SetOutputFilter BUCKETEER
>
> But I changed it to:
> AddOutputFilter BUCKETEER;INCLUDES .shtml
>
> And it still passes.
>
> --Cliff
>
Does the test case have the following turned on?
AddOutputFilter BUCKETEER;INCLUDES .shtml
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 4:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Ron Park
> Subject: RE: Two mo
ned)
With the patch, it seems to throw away too much!
SomethingElseAfter if
:(
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: Ron Park
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Two mod_includ
Yes, this is the patch we tried.
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ron Park
> Subject: RE: Two mod_include problems
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Ron Park wrote:
Sorry for not following up on this thread; other work
priorities set me off on a different tangent.
Unfortunately, it seems your patch from 07/12/03 does
not work on our pages. :( We haven't yet tracked down
*how* it's not working though. More info to follow.
Ron
> -Original Message-
>
ms
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Ron Park wrote:
>
> > We're trying to come up with nice simple test cases to
> > show the problems (all ours involve a proprietary module
> > and mod_proxy but they should be recreatable with some
> > carefully crafted file size
We'll give this patch a shot.
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:27 PM
> To: Ron Park
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Two mod_include problems
>
>
> yOn Wed, 9 Jul 2
ré Malo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 6:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Two mod_include problems
>
>
> * Ron Park wrote:
>
> > At line 438 of mod_include, we see the code is set up to handle
> > this 'left over partial
lines later. It seemed very
redundant.
If anyone knows why this was done and it is important, I can
provide a patch for the two bugs without this change.
Thanks,
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Park [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 3:50 PM
We have run across two problems in mod_include that were
corrupting our pages and would like to share our patches.
Both of these situations are highlighted by situations where
bucketeering and brigading are accentuated (mostly through
the use of mod_proxy to a remote host, but should be testable
w
13 matches
Mail list logo
