On Nov 7, 2008, at 7:37 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Two that I thought the list might find interesting
First Tim Bray gave an overview of mod_atom -- including the things
that were hard about building an apache module:
http://www.tbray.org/tmp/AC2008.pdf
I suppose, if people want, I could
On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:21 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
When svn up breaks a source file, at least you get a
meaningful error message pointing to exactly what needs fixing.
This m4 is nasty!
If /usr/bin/m4 were by arbitrary fiat deleted from all unix-like
systems world-wide, there would be
On Oct 30, 2008, at 2:16 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
I don't think the intention would be to use a single process on
Unix -- we would still spawn multiple children -- they would just
be created using fork+exec of the httpd binary, rather than just
fork.
This doesn't make sense - fork is
Just a piece of advice that, had I'd received it, would have saved me
a couple days of yak shaving. -T
===
--- INSTALL (revision 695999)
+++ INSTALL (working copy)
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@
include a sufficiently
On Sep 9, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
IMHO the following patch should fix the mod_mbox error by correctly
encoding these chars:
Index: module-2.0/mod_mbox_cte.c
===
--- module-2.0/mod_mbox_cte.c (Revision 693585)
+++
On Aug 14, 2008, at 7:18 AM, John Hosie wrote:
What packages do I need to install on a Red Hat Linux server to do C
development and create an Apache module?
On Mac OS X, assuming you've got a C compilation environment (if not,
go get your install CD and install XCode Tools (sigh)), all you
I ran into a showstopper NetBeans problem and until it's fixed, am
switching to Emacs for my module dev work. Any apache/emacs lore
would be appreciated. Will one of the string arguments to c-style Do
The Right Thing? Any other goodies for my .emacs?
-T
On Jun 25, 2008, at 1:00 AM, Jens Frey wrote:
Hi Tim,
thanks so much for pointing me to your example, that seems to work
this way ... just if anyone needs this too, what i did was which
differs
from Tim's version slightly with the file endings.
Yeah, I was previously using *.slo instead
On Jun 24, 2008, at 1:28 AM, Jens Frey wrote:
Hi all,
i am trying to develop a module where parts of the source is in
other files.
The question now is, where exactly in the Makefile do i plug that in?
If i use apxs to build a simple module it creates a few files, like:
I got that working
Disclosure: My autotools expertise is not that great. In fact, since
I've been in Ruby Java mostly the last few years, I may be missing
something obvious at the ld or gcc level. This is all with a fresh
2.2.6 tarball downloaded earlier this week. This note to both
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi... I'm back to work on mod_atom and chasing a weird bug around.
Anyhow I totally can't figure out what some apr code is doing so I
wanted to step into it with the debugger. This sounds lame, but I
can't figure out how to build an httpd that has APR linked with debug
information.
On Jan 9, 2008, at 5:16 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Hi... I'm back to work on mod_atom and chasing a weird bug around.
Anyhow I totally can't figure out what some apr code is doing so I
wanted to step into it with the debugger. This sounds lame, but I
can't figure out how to build an
On Sep 2, 2007, at 5:24 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is nbsp; valid in XML?
The answer is complicated. One approach is to use #xA0; which is
kinda ugly but works in lots more places. -T
On Aug 28, 2007, at 9:08 AM, Tim Olsen wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16593
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38034
I find the mod_dav code a little scary, but on the other hand I have
ETags working properly with PUT in mod_atom, and there are a
On Jun 28, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Brian J. France wrote:
Here is a patch that will allow SIGTERM to work with -X
http://www.brianfrance.com/software/apache/httpd.signal.diff
Without the patch running httpd on the command line with -X and
trying to stop it can only be done by backgrounding it
Passes lots of tests, but still lots of work to do: written up at
(extreme) length here: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/
2007/06/25/mod_atom
I don't know if httpd needs this mod_atom, but I suspect that it'll
need some mod_atom or another before too long. It would be nice to
be
On Jun 27, 2007, at 12:44 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
In a way, you could view the Atom Publishing Protocol in the same
light
as DAV. In that case, it makes sense to have generic module which
handles the protocol bits of APP, and provides a set of
callbacks/providers for other modules to use.
On Jun 27, 2007, at 3:33 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
The whole point of APP is so dumb clients like cellphones and blog-
authoring packages can push bits at a server and leave the server
in control of where things go. I'm trying to imagine what the
storage hooks might look like.
If I am
On Jun 1, 2007, at 7:53 AM, Frank Jones wrote:
Is there a function in the APR or elsewhere that performs URL
encoding/decoding (aka percent-encoding)? I've searched all over for
one but haven't found anything. mod_security has these functions but
it doesn't export them for some reason.
It
I'll open this plea for advice by offering some free advice to other
module-writing newbies like me. When you're trying to figure out wtf
some piece of code, e.g. apr_xml_to_text, does, the following will
get you the answer by example, most times:
find modules -name '*.c' -print | xargs
I want to generate some fairly large amounts of XML programmatically
inside my module. Poking around apr_xml.h and util_xml.h doesn't
turn up a lot of support for this. Am I looking in the wrong
place? Obviously, with qpr_xml_quote_string and apr_rprintf I can do
it by hand, but there
On May 16, 2007, at 11:27 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
You can count on expat 1.95-ish generation (possibly 2.00) to be built
with httpd.
Um... the expat 1.95 that's in the current source doesn't seem to
have any generation functions; am I missing them or did I mis-read
you?
You
I'd be so much happier if I had unit tests, but it's tricky since
everything's static. My best idea is to have an #ifdef TESTING
section in my code that has a main() in it that runs the tests (of
course this means actually *understanding* the lovely makefile
goodness I copied from Josh
On May 1, 2007, at 11:18 AM, josh rotenberg wrote:
I put my tarball of stuff up on google code for anyone else that might
be interested: http://code.google.com/p/modskeleton/
The goal is to have something that sets you up for mutliple source
files, a utils directory for other binary
I'm sketching in a module for 2.2.4 and having trouble with compiling
it on OS X. Neither google nor a survey of this group's archive turn
up any ideas. Suppose I have mod_foo.c; I assume the goal is to
produce a mod_foo.so or mod_foo.dylib in $INSTALL/modules/
Is this written up
25 matches
Mail list logo
