Hello,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> I think this is an interesting opportunity to compare
> different implementations and share code where desirable.
> I haven't seen anyone comment on the proposal yet.
>
Just out of curiosity, Flickr has been a die hard users of Squ
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Albert Lash wrote:
> Speaking of code, I'd be very glad to see more C / C++ in the Apache
> projects. Java is fine but I think Apache went overboard with it a
> little.
+1
On 2/27/07, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You have the choice. If more people use mod_php than fastcgi,
that's because they're choosing it.
yes, this is really interesting. sometimes i really don't understand them...
especially php does not recommended threaded MPM in apache2...so
contin
Hello,
Thanks for your reply first.
I understand Apache already support fastcgi, however, phper most
likely will prefer mod_php, so fastcgi in Apache is not as popular as
in other http servers.
Similarly, later Apache 2.x might officially support event based model
rather than multi-process one.
Can anyone give some comments abt in their implementations which are
difference from Httpd on the following area:
1. single-threaded, event-based, (powered by epoll)
2. fast cgi support
seems that these two points are quite attractive to use, why seldom
heard abt them in Httpd world?
:)
Thank
