Hi apache/apr developers,
sorry for opening the same APR bug report more then once, but I got an error
message from bugzilla that there are missing flags for the attached patch.
Also If I tried to mark the reports as DUPLICATE, I'm getting the first time an
error message with unknown methode in
On 2016-06-16 19:07, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.21 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.21 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Dan
On 2016-06-16 19:07, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.21 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.21 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Dan
On 2016-04-14 22:43, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:28 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>>
>> I've done some tests with 2.4.19 there is maybe an interesting detail.
>> With 2.4.19 the last request is empty for an idle worker, with 2.4.20 not
>> (shows the
On 2016-04-14 22:14, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:05 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>> On 2016-04-14 21:48, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:40 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>>>> I've done a quick test with
>>>> $ ab -n 1
On 2016-04-14 22:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 14.04.2016 um 22:05 schrieb olli hauer:
>> On 2016-04-14 21:48, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:40 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>>>> I've done a quick test with
>>>> $ ab -n 1 -c 100 $h
On 2016-04-14 21:48, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:40 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>> I've done a quick test with
>> $ ab -n 1 -c 100 $host/$url
>>
>> During the test the count of idle worker are incrementing and decrementing
>> but it ab
On 2016-04-14 21:47, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:40 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>> During the test the count of idle worker are incrementing and decrementing
>> but it ab has finished the requests the count of idle workers stays on the
>> last highest count .
On 2016-04-14 20:36, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 7:10 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>> I got this morning a request from a FreeBSD user to back-port r1739008, and
>> also already the feedback that scoreboard is usable again with the patch.
>>
>> Since I
On 2016-04-13 22:04, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:27 AM, wrote:
>> Author: icing
>> Date: Thu Feb 25 10:27:27 2016
>> New Revision: 1732275
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1732275&view=rev
>> Log:
>> merging pre_close_connection hook, prep_lingering_close and
>> ap
On 2016-04-04 18:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.20 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.20 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Dan
On 2016-03-21 18:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.19 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.19 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Dan
On 2015-10-05 23:07, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:30 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>>
>> would you mind to look at #58126 ?
>>
>> It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about
>> underquoted calls to AC_DEFUN.
>
> Comm
On 2015-10-05 17:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I propose a T&R of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I
> will RM.
>
> Comments?
>
Hi Jim,
would you mind to look at #58126 ?
It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about
underquoted calls to AC_DEFUN.
--
Thanks,
o
On 2015-07-03 12:13, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
>
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Rob Stradling [mailto:rob.stradl...@comodo.com]
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Juli 2015 12:01
>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: [RFC] Enable OCSP Stapling by default in httpd trunk
>>
>
On 2015-08-26 17:21, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> I'm planning to tag trunk on 11 Sept to get 2.5.0 and mod_h2 into users
> hands ASAP and collect feedback on that module ahead of any merges back
> into the stable 2.4.x branch.
>
> Concerns/Questions/Roadblocks/Showstoppers?
>
In case there will b
On 2015-06-18 22:17, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 18.06.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:03 PM, olli hauer > <mailto:oha...@gmx.de>> wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-06-18 19:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> > Subj sez it all.
>>
On 2015-06-18 21:54, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:03 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>
>> On 2015-06-18 19:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Subj sez it all.
>>>
>>
>> I don't know if it is worth to report this, but the on 2.4.12. I don't
On 2015-06-18 19:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Subj sez it all.
>
I don't know if it is worth to report this, but the on 2.4.12. I don't see the
following warnings
Test build 2.4.15 (Last Changed Rev: 1686275)
--- core.lo ---
core.c:5003:1: warning: unused variable 'aplog_module_index'
[-Wunused
On 2015-06-16 13:39, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:24 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>>
>> As a side note, even I've read the Release Notes I was thankful to see my
>> console was trashed with the deprecation warning ;)
>>
>> What I miss is a sectio
On 2015-06-15 03:36, Gregg Smith wrote:
> On 6/14/2015 6:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
>> On 6/14/2015 2:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff
>>> I'm fine with this appro
On 2015-06-14 02:46, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Yann Ylavic
>> wrote:
I did not look at pr12355.t and pr43738.t yet, however those passed in
>>
On 2015-05-27 17:34, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Anyone else think it's time to EOL 2.2 and focus
>> on 2.4 and the next gen?
>
>
> Nope, we'll let the internet speak for itself -
>
> http://w3techs.com/technologies/history_details/ws-a
On 2015-05-24 23:25, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 24.05.2015 um 23:08 schrieb olli hauer:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there a chance to get the following revisions merged to 2.2.x
>> - r1551685, r1652929 (fix IPv4 mapping on FreeBSD)
>>
>>
>> In ssl_engine_dh.c
On 2015-05-25 10:44, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:08 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is there a chance to get the following revisions merged to 2.2.x
>>> - r1
Hi,
is there a chance to get the following revisions merged to 2.2.x
- r1551685, r1652929 (fix IPv4 mapping on FreeBSD)
In ssl_engine_dh.c there are calls to generate dh512 and dh1012,
perhaps it is also an idea to drop dh512 and add dh2048 or higher.
-system("openssl gendh $rand -out dh512.pem
On 2015-05-05 15:03, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:52 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>>
>> Concerns / observations / thoughts?
>
> I'd like to propose those 2.4.x CHANGES (r1542327+r1569005+r1542327)
> for backport to 2.2.x (in reverse order):
>
> *) mod_ssl: Fix tmp DH para
On 2015-01-17 14:44, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 17.01.2015 um 05:45 schrieb Rainer Jung:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> Am 23.09.2014 um 13:14 schrieb jkal...@apache.org:
>>> Author: jkaluza
>>> Date: Tue Sep 23 11:14:09 2014
>>> New Revision: 1626978
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1626978
>>> Log:
>>> mod_cgi
ki wrote:> Thx. Will do.
>> > On Jan 8, 2015, at 7:06 AM, olli hauer wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2015-01-08 12:11, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> >> Let's shoot for a T&R next week. The work will keep me
>>> >> warm :)
>>> &g
On 2015-01-08 12:11, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Let's shoot for a T&R next week. The work will keep me
> warm :)
>
Perhaps you can take a look into this two bug id's:
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53824
contains a corrected fix (use correct '[[1234]].*' instead single '[1234]
On 2015-01-02 19:31, Tim Bannister wrote:
> On 2 Jan 2015, at 18:18, olli hauer wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there a special reason to keep SSLv3 support on current httpd version
>> (CVE-2014-3566 POODLE attack) ?
>
> See the previous thread starting at htt
Hi,
is there a special reason to keep SSLv3 support on current httpd version
(CVE-2014-3566 POODLE attack) ?
It seems all mayor browsers have disabled SSLv3 already.
Are the attached patches sufficient to remove SSLv3 support the same way it was
done for SSLv2?
I'm not sure about SSLv23_(clie
Hi Apache team,
in case apache was configured with "--enable-mpms-shared=all" only mpm_event is
listed in httpd.conf.
If an additional MPM was given as default, then this MPM is listed as default
but not the others, anyway in both cases all possible modules where build and
installed.
Resulting
On 2014-08-05 15:21, Mark Blackman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This might be more of user than dev question, but as the discussions about
> timing were here, I’ll go with here.
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201407.mbox/<20140721075315.ec908e91c20de17e6e448089a4bc3ed2.f963b4ea46.wbe
On 2014-07-20 19:14, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 20 Jul 2014, at 18:03, dev wrote:
>
>> Has 2.4.10 been released or not ?
>
> It has been released, but we need to wait for the mirrors to update before
> formerly announcing the release.
>
> Regards,
> Graham
> --
>
Looking at the http://www.ap
On 2014-04-20 19:36, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When browsing https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56371, in
> the top most frame, we can see:
> ASF Bugzilla – Bug 56371 Please merge r1576233 into the next httpd-2.4.10
> version, the fix is missing in httpd-2.4.9
>
> But
On 2014-04-19 10:47, Tom Browder wrote:
>> On Apr 14, 2014, at 13:30, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> I usually force it with ./configure LDFLAGS="-Wl,-rpath
>> -Wl,/path/to/my/openssl".
>> +1 to have this automagically done according to --with-ssl
>
> So that should solve the problem I have on Debian
>
On 2014-04-14 13:08, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> (not to say there aren't complications, like trying to keep system
> directories out of rpath)
>
On FreeBSD it is possible that a user has openssl 0.9.x or 1.0.x in the
base OS (/usr/lib) but installs openssl 1.x.x from the ports system
(/usr/local/lib).
On 2014-03-13 21:55, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
> The pre-release candidate Apache httpd 2.2.27 can be found in;
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> +/-1
> [ ] Release 2.2.27 (apr 1.5.0, apr-util 1.5.3)
>
> Please take note of APR minor version bump from 1.4.8 to 1.5.0.
>
>
On 2013-11-26 22:01, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 26.11.2013 15:58, olli hauer wrote:
>> On 2013-11-25 23:25, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>>> See if this brings any happiness:
>>>
>>> Index: network_io/unix/sockets.c
>>> ==
On 2013-11-25 23:25, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, olli hauer wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-11-25 22:14, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Jeff Trawick
&
On 2013-11-25 22:14, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> Let's move this to dev@httpd and omit dev@apr (after this e-mail)...
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:28 AM, olli hauer wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013
42 matches
Mail list logo
