On Monday 24 October 2005 13:22, Joe Orton wrote:
> There was a thread about this previously; just checking for consensus,
> is there any objection to bumping the apr/apr-util version requirements
> to 1.2.x?  (1.2.x is already required for mod_dbd, event MP, and it will
> simplify the code to allow unconditional use of 1.2.x features)

+1, and that being the very latest 1.2.x (or 1.3.x) in the release tarball.

But 1.2.0 and later should be 'sufficient' to run httpd 2.2, since there are
no API/ABI changes IIRC.

Bill

Reply via email to