Re: [PATCH] - Add a "detached" parameter to ap_cgi_build_command()for CGI...

2002-06-05 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Since we've already bit the mmn bump hurdle, this is a no-brainer for > inclusion -before- we roll 2.0.37 +1 to getting this settled before 2.0.37 (though I haven't looked at the patch in detail yet). --Cliff

Re: [PATCH] - Add a "detached" parameter to ap_cgi_build_command() for CGI...

2002-06-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:49 PM 6/5/2002, you wrote: >I took the build parameters and put them into a cgi_exec_info_t >structure that is passed to the build_command function. This cleans up >the parameter list. +1 to this patch. Feel free to apply [although you might wait for another plus one... I'm afraid not

Re: [PATCH] - Add a "detached" parameter to ap_cgi_build_command() for CGI...

2002-06-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Although win32 shares the same issue... still... ick... Suppose it is time that we stuff the exec_info (renamed ap_exec_info_t) in place of the apr_cmdtype_e, and allow the ap_cgi_build_command() integrator to modify any of the flags/fields in that structure? Bill At 12:10 PM 6/5/2002, Brad

[PATCH] - Add a "detached" parameter to ap_cgi_build_command()for CGI...

2002-06-05 Thread Brad Nicholes
This patch adds the "detached" parameter to the ap_cgi_build_command() optional function. This allows the OS to specify whether the CGI binary should be spawned detached or not. Specifically for NetWare this allows us to determine wheither a CGI NLM should be executed in the same address spa