https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17629
Here's an attempt at fixing the dreaded PR 17629. This is a bug in the
handling of the output filter chain at the point where an internal
redirect is applied to a subrequest. Complications:
a) a subrequest's filter chain may start at
On 06/08/2010 02:37 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17629
Here's an attempt at fixing the dreaded PR 17629. This is a bug in the
handling of the output filter chain at the point where an internal
redirect is applied to a subrequest. Complications:
a) a
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton
Sent: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2010 14:38
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [PATCH] PR 17629 and all that
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17629
Here's an attempt at fixing the dreaded PR 17629. This is a
bug in the
handling
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 05:20:16PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
Is it possible to have any non subrequest specific filters below the
ap_subreq_core_filter_handle?
It is no that the current patch does not handle this but wouldn't it be
possible
to just throw away any filter between
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton
Sent: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2010 17:36
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR 17629 and all that
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 05:20:16PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger,
VF-Group wrote:
Is it possible to have any non subrequest specific filters
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 06:17:29PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
I'd spent some time working on exactly that approach, trying to
answer that question. But surprisingly the answer is yes - the
subreq filter has ftype=AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET, so any filter
registered with an ftype
So since nobody has told me I'm an idiot yet, I've committed this to the
trunk for wider testing:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=952828
Regards, Joe
