On 10/3/05, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/15/05, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/25/05, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've attached a patch that resolves the hostname in the URI and hands
> > > that off separately to ap_proxy_checkproxyblock().
On 6/15/05, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/25/05, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've attached a patch that resolves the hostname in the URI and hands
> > that off separately to ap_proxy_checkproxyblock().
> Any comments from the peanut gallery, particularly the prox
On 4/25/05, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've attached a patch that resolves the hostname in the URI and hands
> that off separately to ap_proxy_checkproxyblock(). Not quite sure of
> the pool usage though.
pool looks right to me...
>
> In the event that we're forwarding to anoth
I'm seeing changed behavior between 2.1 and previous releases, under
the following example config:
ProxyRequests on
ProxyRemote * http://proxy:8080
ProxyBlock blocked
In a request for http://requested/ I can see that mod_proxy compares
the addresses for blocked with those of proxy as opposed