On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:07:22PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> >
> > Why are there some circumstances when f->c is NULL but f->r and
> > f->r->connection are valid? I could understand f->r being NULL while f->c
> > would not be, but the other way
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:07:22PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
>>Why are there some circumstances when f->c is NULL but f->r and
>>f->r->connection are valid? I could understand f->r being NULL while f->c
>>would not be, but the other way around took me totally by sur
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 11:07:22PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> Why are there some circumstances when f->c is NULL but f->r and
> f->r->connection are valid? I could understand f->r being NULL while f->c
> would not be, but the other way around took me totally by surprise.
I agree. I wonder
