On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:37 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I vote for the small patch, and canl also throw in a spell check for
that last comment above.
Both look good and pass tests, but I also prefer, and vote +1 for,
the small patch :)
Should have review cycles over the weekend...
On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:37 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 10/22/07, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
like 2.0/2.2/trunk
attached is an updated patch for the boil-the-ocean flavor; at the
bottom is a tiny alternative
some ways to slice through t
On 10/24/07, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote for the small patch, and canl also throw in a spell check for
> that last comment above.
Couldn't find any problem in either the big or small patches, which I
guess amounts to a vote for the small patch (although axing the body
of that
On 10/22/07, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> like 2.0/2.2/trunk
attached is an updated patch for the boil-the-ocean flavor; at the
bottom is a tiny alternative
some ways to slice through the big patch:
1. my BIG 1.3 patch vs. the 2.0 commit
essentially same changes except for
s/apr_d
On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 10/23/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 7:20 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
like 2.0/2.2/trunk
I'm looking for a conceptual +1 out there.
You got it. Conceptual +1 :)
Thanks ;) Kind of silly I realize, but I
On 10/23/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 22, 2007, at 7:20 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> > like 2.0/2.2/trunk
> >
> > I'm looking for a conceptual +1 out there.
> >
>
> You got it. Conceptual +1 :)
Thanks ;) Kind of silly I realize, but I wanted to make sure that if
I spend
On Oct 22, 2007, at 7:20 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
like 2.0/2.2/trunk
I'm looking for a conceptual +1 out there.
You got it. Conceptual +1 :)
like 2.0/2.2/trunk
I'm looking for a conceptual +1 out there.
I've barely tested it and need to summarize the diffs between ap_ and
apr_ functions again. (e.g., "apr_date_parse_http supports format XXX
that ap_parseHTTPdate() doesn't support, but ap_proxy_date_canon()
didn't allow that before an
