Re: [PATCH] post_connection hook

2002-11-14 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 03:36 AM 11/14/2002, James Ponder wrote: >On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 08:43:05PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> The recommended approach is to register a cleanup with the conn_rec >> pool. When the connection goes away, so does the conn_rec pool, and >> your cleanup will then run. > >Does that place

Re: [PATCH] post_connection hook

2002-11-14 Thread Jeff Trawick
James Ponder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 08:43:05PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > The recommended approach is to register a cleanup with the conn_rec > > pool. When the connection goes away, so does the conn_rec pool, and > > your cleanup will then run. > > Does that p

Re: [PATCH] post_connection hook

2002-11-14 Thread James Ponder
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 08:43:05PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > The recommended approach is to register a cleanup with the conn_rec > pool. When the connection goes away, so does the conn_rec pool, and > your cleanup will then run. Does that place any restrictions on what can be done in the clean

Re: [PATCH] post_connection hook

2002-11-13 Thread Jeff Trawick
James Ponder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would like to be able to monitor connection establishment > (pre_connection) and connection termination (post_connection), however > only the former hook exists. I was thinking the best way would be to modify > ap_process_connection in connection.c to

[PATCH] post_connection hook

2002-11-13 Thread James Ponder
Hi. I would like to be able to monitor connection establishment (pre_connection) and connection termination (post_connection), however only the former hook exists. I was thinking the best way would be to modify ap_process_connection in connection.c to add the post_connection hook, as below: AP_C