On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:21:33PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> I finally had time to review and commit this. Keep 'em coming.
Cool. Thanks for the quick turnaround. I just posted another improvement,
and I'll be posting a third in the next few minutes :)
-aaron
On Monday 17 September 2001 11:12 am, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> After working with my two proposed worker MPM models, I've become more
> confident in the simple model. I'll continue benchmarking both designs,
> but I wanted to get this one out to fix what's in CVS right now, and
> so I can provide so
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:07:06PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
> Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> >After working with my two proposed worker MPM models, I've become more
> >confident in the simple model. I'll continue benchmarking both designs,
> >but I wanted to get this one out to fix what's in CVS right
Aaron Bannert wrote:
>After working with my two proposed worker MPM models, I've become more
>confident in the simple model. I'll continue benchmarking both designs,
>but I wanted to get this one out to fix what's in CVS right now, and
>so I can provide some more tweaks I've been working on (turn
After working with my two proposed worker MPM models, I've become more
confident in the simple model. I'll continue benchmarking both designs,
but I wanted to get this one out to fix what's in CVS right now, and
so I can provide some more tweaks I've been working on (turn the LIFO
queue to a FIFO,
