Re: [PROPOSAL] cgi_exec_info_t: detached & addrspace fields combined

2004-06-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:17 AM 6/28/2004, Joe Orton wrote: >OK, the apr_procattr_addrspace_set() interface is sufficient to solve >this problem, right? And there's no issue with back-porting that to the >APR 0.9 branch? The only issue is how to use that interface from >mod_cgi/the Netware MPM without requiring an h

Re: [PROPOSAL] cgi_exec_info_t: detached & addrspace fields combined

2004-06-28 Thread Joe Orton
OK, the apr_procattr_addrspace_set() interface is sufficient to solve this problem, right? And there's no issue with back-porting that to the APR 0.9 branch? The only issue is how to use that interface from mod_cgi/the Netware MPM without requiring an httpd major MMN bump? So why not just overlo

[PROPOSAL] cgi_exec_info_t: detached & addrspace fields combined

2004-06-24 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
To replace the addrspace field that was added in the cgi_exec_info_t struct in mod_cgi.h I will like to propose extending the use of the detached (apr_int32_t) field in cgi_exec_info_t and apr_procattr_t structs. Currently that field is set to 0 by default and 1 if the process to be created wi