Re: [PROPOSAL] default MAXMEMFREE value

2003-09-10 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
This is a double send from last week (look at the date). It was probably lost on a queue somewhere for a week.   Anyway, that proposal did not fly. I will try to get memory/performance data on my Linux box by the end of the week. As a possible solution for NetWare, we will put the MAXMEMFREE dire

[PROPOSAL] default MAXMEMFREE value

2003-09-10 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
MAXMEMFREE fixes were checked in the 2.1 tree last week for most of the MPMs (except Win32). A back port has also been proposed.   I will like to propose insertion of the MAXMEMFREE directive in the configuration file. I am suggesting that 100 (KBytes) should be used as a default size. Used wit

Re: [PROPOSAL] default MAXMEMFREE value

2003-09-03 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: > MAXMEMFREE fixes were checked in the 2.1 tree last week for most of the > MPMs (except Win32). A back port has also been proposed. I will like to > propose insertion of the MAXMEMFREE directive in the configuration file. +1 --Cliff

[PROPOSAL] default MAXMEMFREE value

2003-09-03 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
MAXMEMFREE fixes were checked in the 2.1 tree last week for most of the MPMs (except Win32). A back port has also been proposed.   I will like to propose insertion of the MAXMEMFREE directive in the configuration file. I am suggesting that 100 (KBytes) should be used as a default size, but coul