On Apr 3, 2012, at 9:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I will absolutely not shirk my own responsibility, which in this matter, is
neither the responsibility of a committer placing code at the ASF, an officer
acting under the direction of the BoD, nor a a director of the ASF. Which is
to
didn't reach agreement
on combine.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [RE-VOTE #3] adoption of mod_combine subproject
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:13:39 -0500
From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: legal-disc...@apache.org
On 4/4/2012 7:52 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr
On 3/28/2012 6:04 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Guys. You were asked a boolean question. I'm pretty sure it was
intended to be taken literally. Have you considered just answering it?
I believe that you meant to direct this to Graham and cc me, and not visa
versa, since I don't have such an
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 13:16:22 -0500:
On 3/28/2012 6:04 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Guys. You were asked a boolean question. I'm pretty sure it was
intended to be taken literally. Have you considered just answering it?
I believe that you meant to direct this to
On 4/3/2012 2:01 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 13:16:22 -0500:
I also believe he did so (you
might also refer to the bugzilla ticket Sam hasn't replied to yet).
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52322
Thanks for the pointer --
On 4/3/2012 7:28 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 04/03/2012 08:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Sam's prime weakness is an aversion to delegation.
You have that exactly 180 degrees backwards. I am not responding precisely
BECAUSE I
believe in delegation.
As well you should... it is for the PMC
From the Apache HTTP Server project;
On the combined topics of mod_firehose, mod_policy and mod_combine;
Declaring the vote on #3 failed (both originally, and the revote). RE-VOTE
#1 and #2 for firehose and policy modules (respectively) each have passed, for
adoption into httpd trunk.
On 28 Mar 2012, at 1:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Cut out the drama. It is not helpful here.
The simple question is whether or not Graham has met the conditions specified
in section 3 and 4 of the ICLA:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
Answer that in the affirmative, and you are
...@intertwingly.net
Cc: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net, dev@httpd.apache.org,
legal-disc...@apache.org, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com, Roy T. Fielding
field...@gbiv.com, Simon Lucy simon.l...@bbc.co.uk
Sent: Wed, Mar 28, 2012 13:21:47 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [RE-VOTE #3] adoption
Guys. You were asked a boolean question. I'm pretty sure it was
intended to be taken literally. Have you considered just answering it?
On 3/5/2012 12:29 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:08 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
A proposal to adopt mod_combine is attached.
[ ] Option 1: adopt as trunk module
[ ] Option 2: adopt only as subproject
[X] Option 3: do not adopt
Before tallying, I
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:54 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/5/2012 12:29 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:08 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
A proposal to adopt mod_combine is attached.
[ ] Option 1: adopt as trunk module
[ ]
This vote has another 15 hours to run. I'm personally -0 for adopting
this module at all, it seems to run afoul of some design considerations
that have excluded other modules in the past, such as mod_macro, from
becoming part of httpd. That there are multiple static resources to
be presented as
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:08 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
A proposal to adopt mod_combine is attached.
[ ] Option 1: adopt as trunk module
[ ] Option 2: adopt only as subproject
[X] Option 3: do not adopt
On 05 Mar 2012, at 8:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This vote has another 15 hours to run. I'm personally -0 for adopting
this module at all, it seems to run afoul of some design considerations
that have excluded other modules in the past, such as mod_macro, from
becoming part of httpd.
A proposal to adopt mod_combine is attached.
[ ] Option 1: adopt as trunk module
[ ] Option 2: adopt only as subproject
[ ] Option 3: do not adopt
[Prior to this vote, this proposal had not passed; jim alone had joined
minfrin in supporting the proposal. Please take another look and
16 matches
Mail list logo
