Damn.
+1 from me ;)
nd
On Thursday 31 January 2013 14:57:09 Daniel Gruno wrote:
> With another 72 hours passed and no new votes cast, I am satisfied that
> the motion has been carried, so to speak. I'll get started preparing the
> new site and contacting old authors/maintainers.
>
> With regards
With another 72 hours passed and no new votes cast, I am satisfied that
the motion has been carried, so to speak. I'll get started preparing the
new site and contacting old authors/maintainers.
With regards,
Daniel.
Previous vote email follows, for reference:
Oh, a vote deep in the middle of a discussion thread :-(
nd
On Monday 28 January 2013 14:25:09 Daniel Gruno wrote:
> With the clock passing 13:20 GMT, the voting has ended, and been
> tallied. There was some concern about the DNS solution in the proposal,
> which has been adjusted to a subdirecto
With the clock passing 13:20 GMT, the voting has ended, and been
tallied. There was some concern about the DNS solution in the proposal,
which has been adjusted to a subdirectory instead (and all URLs on the
old site has been adjusted to use relative hrefs), and with no
objections to that, the vote