Re: [SECURITY] Remote exploit for 32-bit Apache HTTP Server known

2002-06-21 Thread harald
Concerning this vulnerability: is safe to assume that a patched reverse proxy will protect a vulnerable back end server from such malicious requests? cu - Harry jwoolley == jwoolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: jwoolley [[ Note: this issue affects both 32-bit and 64-bit jwoolley

Re: [SECURITY] Remote exploit for 32-bit Apache HTTP Server known

2002-06-21 Thread Graham Leggett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Concerning this vulnerability: is safe to assume that a patched reverse proxy will protect a vulnerable back end server from such malicious requests? I would imagine so, yes. Regards, Graham -- - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SECURITY] Remote exploit for 32-bit Apache HTTP Server known

2002-06-21 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Concerning this vulnerability: is safe to assume that a patched reverse proxy will protect a vulnerable back end server from such malicious requests? I think that even unpatched Apache will protect backend - as all modules that have deal with