Hi list,
attached patch fixes the bug# 26152 as described in
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26152
Main purpose was to handle backslashes in the URI to avoid misleading
interpretation via the underlying cygwin OS layer, which allows
backslashes as directory delimiters.
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 05:48:48PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list,
attached patch fixes the bug# 26152 as described in
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26152
Main purpose was to handle backslashes in the URI to avoid misleading
interpretation via the underlying cygwin
-1. Reject the request with a 400 error instead.
Roy
At 05:45 PM 2/4/2004, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
-1. Reject the request with a 400 error instead.
++1 to Roy's suggestion.
I believe that Win32 may accept the back slash (with the changes proposed
for the cygwin port.) However ... here's the trick ... the cygwin httpd port
is emulating Unix, so it
Hi Roy,
Roy T. Fielding wrote
-1. Reject the request with a 400 error instead.
actually a standard (apache layout) install (from source) on a linux
box with the URI described in the bug report gives also a 404, and
*not* a 400 in response.
So we get the same behaviour on cygwin as on
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 05:45 PM 2/4/2004, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
-1. Reject the request with a 400 error instead.
++1 to Roy's suggestion.
I believe that Win32 may accept the back slash (with the changes proposed
for the cygwin port.) However ... here's the trick ... the
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi Roy,
Roy T. Fielding wrote
-1. Reject the request with a 400 error instead.
actually a standard (apache layout) install (from source) on a linux
box with the URI described in the bug report gives also a 404, and
*not* a 400 in response.
So we get the same
