Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 9 23:45:36 2005

2005-03-10 Thread Jess Holle
Paul Querna wrote: Jess Holle wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: CURRENT VOTES: * Promote mod_ldap and mod_auth_ldap from experimental to non experimental status. +1: bnicholes, wrowe +0: minfrin (wait till the last cache bugs are ironed out) I think we're pretty well there

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 9 23:45:36 2005

2005-03-10 Thread Brad Nicholes
For 2.0 auth_ldap and mod_ldap it will probably forever remain experimental. There have been a lot of changes that have gone into the 2.1 version that IMO allowed it to graduate from experimental to a standard module. Most of these patches will never be backported to 2.0. In fact Josh's

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 9 23:45:36 2005

2005-03-10 Thread Jess Holle
Brad Nicholes wrote: For 2.0 auth_ldap and mod_ldap it will probably forever remain experimental. There have been a lot of changes that have gone into the 2.1 version that IMO allowed it to graduate from experimental to a standard module. Most of these patches will never be backported to 2.0.

Auth_ldap experimental status (was:Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 9 23:45:36 2005)

2005-03-10 Thread Brad Nicholes
I am of the same opinion as Justin in that I believe that multiple auth providers can be put into 2.2 at anytime. If it happens to make it before initial release fine. If it is after, it is just additional functionality which won't break backward compatibility. As far as backporting other

Re: Auth_ldap experimental status (was:Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 9 23:45:36 2005)

2005-03-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:47 AM 3/10/2005, Brad Nicholes wrote: I am of the same opinion as Justin in that I believe that multiple auth providers can be put into 2.2 at anytime. Given that we won't be doing multiple Auth Configs inside each protocol, there is no tie in here to declaring ldap non-experimental. I

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 9 23:45:36 2005

2005-03-10 Thread Shannon Eric Peevey
Brad Nicholes wrote: For 2.0 auth_ldap and mod_ldap it will probably forever remain experimental. There have been a lot of changes that have gone into the 2.1 version that IMO allowed it to graduate from experimental to a standard module. Most of these patches will never be backported to 2.0.

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 9 23:45:36 2005

2005-03-10 Thread Jess Holle
Shannon Eric Peevey wrote: Brad Nicholes wrote: For 2.0 auth_ldap and mod_ldap it will probably forever remain experimental. There have been a lot of changes that have gone into the 2.1 version that IMO allowed it to graduate from experimental to a standard module. Most of these patches will

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 9 23:45:36 2005

2005-03-09 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2005-03-01 05:02:06 -0500 (Tue, 01 Mar 2005) $] The current version of this file can be found at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Release history: 2.0.54 :

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 9 23:45:36 2005

2005-03-09 Thread Jess Holle
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: CURRENT VOTES: * Promote mod_ldap and mod_auth_ldap from experimental to non experimental status. +1: bnicholes, wrowe +0: minfrin (wait till the last cache bugs are ironed out) I think we're pretty well there -- at least in 2.0.53 plus the recent

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 9 23:45:36 2005

2005-03-09 Thread Paul Querna
Jess Holle wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: CURRENT VOTES: * Promote mod_ldap and mod_auth_ldap from experimental to non experimental status. +1: bnicholes, wrowe +0: minfrin (wait till the last cache bugs are ironed out) I think we're pretty well there -- at least in