On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 09:51:37PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > On 1/9/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> The directories themselves, nevermind the .mak files within them, should
> >> have never existed in a source package.
> >
> > So
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 1/9/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> The directories themselves, nevermind the .mak files within them, should
>> have never existed in a source package.
>
> So, what Makefile.win does hack-msvc8-httpd-2.2.4.patch apply to?
Justin, this is giv
On 1/9/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
More to the point, it was their makefile (patched as needed, but that's
not the point) ... but not the rest of their packages. We don't ship
zlib/openssl sources in the package. In my build structure, they are
just junctions. I was bei
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 1/9/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, correcting the additional cruft under srclib/zlib and
>> srclib/openssl,
>> which are not part of the distribution, is a no brainer.
>
> AIUI, it changes our Makefile not theirs.
More to the point, it
On 1/9/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, correcting the additional cruft under srclib/zlib and srclib/openssl,
which are not part of the distribution, is a no brainer.
AIUI, it changes our Makefile not theirs.
So I presume you object to the six line patch I attached?
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> I'm very very much against changing release artifacts once they have
> been produced. Those changes mandate 2.2.5, IMO. -- justin
Well, correcting the additional cruft under srclib/zlib and srclib/openssl,
which are not part of the distribution, is a no brainer.
So
On 1/9/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> Um, 'updated' how? Did you mean 'uploaded'? -- justin
Updated per the other comments in the same email you elided.
Your email did not make it clear at all what specifically changed.
I'm very very much ag
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> Um, 'updated' how? Did you mean 'uploaded'? -- justin
Updated per the other comments in the same email you elided.
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 12:09:17AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Before I go any further, httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip is updated here at 6am UT
> and will take an hour to move across to the live site
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> while the .tar files remain unchanged. Feedback
On Jan 8, 2007, at 10:09 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The RC has been running on people.apache.org as of 1:46PM today.
Rekicked a 48 hour release clock from that mark. Afternoon the of the
9th I'll call the vote, it would be good to see a two-day update from
yourself, Joe or another infr
Before I go any further, httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip is updated here at 6am UT
and will take an hour to move across to the live site
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
while the .tar files remain unchanged. Feedback to several issues inline...
Sander Temme wrote on 01/07/07:
>
> The RC has bee
11 matches
Mail list logo
