Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 10:49 AM 9/15/2004, you wrote: >Is there an ETA on the Win32 source bundle? About one hour. Bill

Antw: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Andre Schild
Builds and runs OK on WIN32 as well. André >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15.09.2004 15:46:45 >>> Hi, I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/. Please test and vote, Sander

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Jess Holle
Is there an ETA on the Win32 source bundle? Thanks. -- Jess Holle Sander Striker wrote: From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:33 PM On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Thom May wrote: * Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Graham Leggett
Sander Striker wrote: I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/. Please test and vote, Tested the RPM build under RHEL3, and it worked fine: +1. Regards, Graham --

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Joshua Slive
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Sander Striker wrote: From: "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:49 PM Thanks. I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area. Could someone please take care of the httpd.apache.org site? I'm in a bit of a bind currently (for at least a

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Sander Striker
> From: "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:49 PM > Thanks. I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area. Could someone please take care of the httpd.apache.org site? I'm in a bit of a bind currently (for at least another 1-2 hours). Sander

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Sander Striker
From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:33 PM > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Thom May wrote: > > > * Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/. > >> Please test and vote

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Joshua Slive
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Thom May wrote: * Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : Hi, I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/. Please test and vote, +1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested) +1 Running on ajax.apache.org (www.eu.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 03:46:45PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: > I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/. > Please test and vote, +1, build+httpd-test good on the usual Linuxes here, confirmed security fixes for mod_dav_fs, ap_resolve_env and apr_uri_parse on x86_

Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Thom May
* Sander Striker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Hi, > > I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/. > Please test and vote, > +1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested) -Thom -- That sounds like a lot of work... Can we out source? The Re

[VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51

2004-09-15 Thread Sander Striker
Hi, I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/. Please test and vote, Sander