On Nov 11, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
The procedure is:
(1) make this thread a formal vote
I'd like to transform this into a formal vote thread to accept the
mod_wombat subproject. Specifically, we aim to make httpd scriptable
via the Lua programming language, for module
I'm happy to see wombat enter the ASF, but as an httpd-sponsored incubation
project. My question is, if we are punting mod_python out to a TLP, and
mod_perl is already a TLP - is this a fit as a subproject of httpd, or it's
own TLP?
Brian McCallister wrote:
>
> On Nov 11, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Ro
Brian McCallister wrote:
The procedure is:
(1) make this thread a formal vote
I'd like to transform this into a formal vote thread to accept the
mod_wombat subproject. Specifically, we aim to make httpd scriptable via
the Lua programming language, for modules and configuration.
I think
On Nov 19, 2006, at 6:58 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
I think the acceptance of mod_wombat and how config may become
scriptable are two very separate issues, I suggest a vote just for
the acceptance of mod_wombat first.
Yes. I am, quite assuredly as I would not of what I spoke, not
proposin
On 11/20/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/17/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm happy to see wombat enter the ASF, but as an httpd-sponsored incubation
> project. My question is, if we are punting mod_python out to a TLP, and
> mod_perl is already a T
On Nov 20, 2006, at 9:28 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Regardless of any plans people have to use this stuff in the core, it
seems like the reason that mod_perl and mod_python either are separate
TLPs or are pushing to be one is because their communities don't
really overlap with that of core httpd
