Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha

2009-01-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Eric Covener wrote: Is there any concern about the SNI support sitting in trunk? IIUC Joe's specific concern (testable failure) referenced in the stalled backport proposal are addressed by a later trunk commit, but there is still the spectre of similar but undiscovered cases and the issue of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha

2009-01-18 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Jan 8, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Paul Querna wrote: Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes. I guess 2.3.1 was DOA. I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on starting 2.3.2 early next

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha

2009-01-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jan 8, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Paul Querna wrote: Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes. I guess 2.3.1 was DOA. I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on starting 2.3.2 early next week? +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha

2009-01-08 Thread Paul Querna
Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes. I guess 2.3.1 was DOA. I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on starting 2.3.2 early next week? -Paul Paul Querna wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha

2009-01-08 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.01.2009 19:33, Paul Querna wrote: Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes. I guess 2.3.1 was DOA. I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on starting 2.3.2 early next week? There is not yet any fix in trunk for the delayed closing of files when using

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha

2009-01-08 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/08/2009 08:02 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 08.01.2009 19:33, Paul Querna wrote: Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes. I guess 2.3.1 was DOA. I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on starting 2.3.2 early next week? There is not yet any fix in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha

2009-01-08 Thread Graham Leggett
Paul Querna wrote: Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes. I guess 2.3.1 was DOA. I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on starting 2.3.2 early next week? +1 :) Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha

2009-01-03 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 01/03/2009 07:39 AM, Paul Querna wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; ±1 [ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Thursday January 8 2009. -1. It crashes on start

[VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha

2009-01-02 Thread Paul Querna
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; ±1 [ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Thursday January 8 2009. Thanks, Paul

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha

2009-01-02 Thread Paul Querna
Paul Querna wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; ±1 [ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha This should actually be Release httpd-2.3.1 as Alpha, but I fail at editing copied text. I hope everyone

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.1-alpha

2009-01-02 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Paul Querna c...@force-elite.com wrote: [ -1 ] Release httpd-2.3.1 as Alpha For me, r730882 busts the build on Mac OS X. (It can't find pcre.) More in my reply to the commit msg... -- justin