Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Reading backwards... +1 - deferring the announcement would be fine. We simply can't make 2.4.32 "disappear" as unreleased. On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We > can easily release a quick

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On 2018-03-16 08:03, Jim Jagielski wrote: Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We can easily release a quick 2.4.33 and announce *that*. 2.4.32 was/is just an un-announced release. Personally, I prefer this approach. I've been holding off on sending the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We can easily release a quick 2.4.33 and announce *that*. 2.4.32 was/is just an un-announced release. > On Mar 15, 2018, at 2:51 PM, Christophe Jaillet > wrote: > > Le 15/03/2018 à 17:34, Yann

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:17:45 -0500): >That still leaves the headache of fallback-to-release when a candidate on >these many projects isn't present (actually, the smart election between >candidate and release if both exist!) But great pointer, TY! The

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

That still leaves the headache of fallback-to-release when a candidate on these many projects isn't present (actually, the smart election between candidate and release if both exist!) But great pointer, TY! On Mar 15, 2018 21:46, "Jan Ehrhardt" wrote: > William A Rowe Jr in

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:11:10 -0500): >https://github.com/appsuite/oss-httpd-build is where this all lives, and is >where the localized PERL5LIB schema for all the components will land. >This can be further streamlined, and the really big caveat is that

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote: This looks sensible, or do we say that users of

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >>> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer >>> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience? >>

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer >> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience? > > +1 Should we also mention the regression against mod_security on Windows? (Nobody

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

> -Original Message- > From: William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 4:28 PM > To: httpd <dev@httpd.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Rugge

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer > on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience? +1

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > *** Changes here >We consider this release to be the best version of Apache available for >non-Windows platforms, and encourage users of all prior versions to > upgrade. > >Please note, a bug after

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

> -Original Message- > From: Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:09 PM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > Am 15.03.2018 um 17:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic: > > On Thu, Mar 15

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:52:48 > -0500): >>The largest headache is provisioning the entire suite of non-default perl >>modules required. Running the framework is trivial. I've been

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:52:48 -0500): >The largest headache is provisioning the entire suite of non-default perl >modules required. Running the framework is trivial. I've been working on >some workaround to this for unix and windows for "stock" test boxes.

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Rainer Jung in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:15:13 +0100): >The artefacts are on the mirrors and out in the wild, so we can not get >them back. Best is to soon proceed with the release and document the >mod_proxy_balancer on Windows regression in the announcement. +1 >About "not

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 15.03.2018 um 18:09 schrieb Eric Covener: >> >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: >>> >>> Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 >>> -0400):

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Le 15/03/2018 à 17:34, Yann Ylavic a écrit : On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via ANNOUNCE. Thoughts? I

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 18:09 schrieb Eric Covener: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 -0400): +1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't quickly/casually picking up source

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 15.03.2018 um 17:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via ANNOUNCE. Thoughts? I

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 > -0400): >>+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't >>quickly/casually picking up source releases. > > Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 > -0400): >>+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't >>quickly/casually picking up source releases. > > Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38 -0400): >+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't >quickly/casually picking up source releases. Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the monthly Windows Update and with a curl release. I upgraded everything yesterday... --

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> >> Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will >> see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will > see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via > ANNOUNCE. > Thoughts? I think we should complete this release,

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:00 PM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > Hi, all; > > On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri"

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Hi > On 13 Mar 2018, at 16:59, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; > >> On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote: >> Hi, all; >> >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 14.03.2018 um 16:10 schrieb Joe Orton: On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:56:19PM +, Joe Orton wrote: This looks like the failure I see when localhost resolves to both ::1 and 127.0.0.1, which happens with modern Fedora hosts: $ grep localhost /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 14.03.2018 um 19:59 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: On 2018-03-14 09:56, Joe Orton wrote: On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: All 280 builds succeeded. Geez, now I feel bad just testing one build ;) Great stuff! +1! Rainer must be a machine... or, perhaps only

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On 2018-03-14 09:56, Joe Orton wrote: On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: All 280 builds succeeded. Geez, now I feel bad just testing one build ;) Great stuff! +1! Rainer must be a machine... or, perhaps only partially... cyborg, maybe? Regardless, I always look

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

+1! All good THX! > On Mar 9, 2018, at 9:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > I would like to

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:56:19PM +, Joe Orton wrote: > This looks like the failure I see when localhost resolves to both ::1 > and 127.0.0.1, which happens with modern Fedora hosts: > > $ grep localhost /etc/hosts > 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: > All 280 builds succeeded. Geez, now I feel bad just testing one build ;) Great stuff! > The following test failures were seen: > > a t/ab/base.t tests 1, 3 and 5 fail always on Linux > - # Failed test 1 in t/ab/base.t at line 29 >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Am 10.03.2018 um 03:49 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.32: [X] +1: It's not just

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

+1 Darwin 17.4.0 > Am 13.03.2018 um 14:36 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : > > Thanks, Steffen; > Do you have a degree of confidence to record a vote on the release one way or > the other? > -- > Daniel Ruggeri > > On March 13, 2018 8:25:35 AM CDT, Steffen

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Hi, all; On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote: > Hi, all; > >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

+0 When there some pop's up from the AL community, I let it know. On Tuesday 13/03/2018 at 14:37, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Thanks, Steffen; Do you have a degree of confidence to record a vote on the release one way or the other? -- Daniel Ruggeri On March 13, 2018 8:25:35 AM CDT,

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Thanks, Steffen; Do you have a degree of confidence to record a vote on the release one way or the other? -- Daniel Ruggeri On March 13, 2018 8:25:35 AM CDT, Steffen wrote: > >For testing available at >www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36581#36581 > >Attention.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

For testing available at www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36581#36581 Attention. An extra fix is applied for crashing external modules like mod_security. Expected is that this fix is becoming official in the next release. Thanks Yann Ylavic ! As usual report issues to me, AL or

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Daniel, I see no Jansson in you libary list, you did not build/tested mod_md ? For your info, not relevant : Here we use newer versions with 2.4.32 for: Brotli 1.0.3 libxml2 2.9.8 nghttp2 1.31.0 On Saturday 10/03/2018 at 05:08, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball as 2.4.32: > +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! All fine (no regression) on up to date Debian's 9 (64bit), 8 (64bit) and

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:49:15PM -0600, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball as

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On 10/03/2018 12:49, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball as 2.4.32: > > [ ] +1:

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On 3/9/2018 6:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.32: [+1]: So far, so good.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote: > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball as

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.32: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.