Le 03/04/2019 à 08:24, Niklas Edmundsson a écrit :
On Sat, 30 Mar 2019, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
I am pleased to report that the vote has PASSED with the following
recorded votes:
+1: jorton, icing, jim, ylavic, covener, rjung, druggeri
+0: cjaillet (apparent test system issue)
On Sat, 30 Mar 2019, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
I am pleased to report that the vote has PASSED with the following
recorded votes:
+1: jorton, icing, jim, ylavic, covener, rjung, druggeri
+0: cjaillet (apparent test system issue)
Thanks to everyone who took the time to test and vote as
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 07:17:59AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> =
> t/ssl/varlookup.t .. 73/83 [ error] oh dangnabit, server dumped core
>
> Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> #0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
> 50
Hi, all;
I am pleased to report that the vote has PASSED with the following
recorded votes:
+1: jorton, icing, jim, ylavic, covener, rjung, druggeri
+0: cjaillet (apparent test system issue)
Thanks to everyone who took the time to test and vote as well as the
work that went into the release
On 3/27/2019 10:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.39:
> [X] +1: It's not
Am 27.03.2019 um 16:09 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.39:
[X] +1: It's not just good,
Le 29/03/2019 à 23:57, Yann Ylavic a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:53 PM Marion & Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
Could others confirm that they have tested with 'prefork' and that they
don't have any issue?
No issue here with the somewhat similar Debian 10 / gcc-8.3 /
libssl-1.1.1b. I don't
Le 29/03/2019 à 23:57, Yann Ylavic a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:53 PM Marion & Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
Could others confirm that they have tested with 'prefork' and that they
don't have any issue?
No issue here with the somewhat similar Debian 10 / gcc-8.3 /
libssl-1.1.1b. I don't
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:53 PM Marion & Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
>
> Could others confirm that they have tested with 'prefork' and that they
> don't have any issue?
No issue here with the somewhat similar Debian 10 / gcc-8.3 /
libssl-1.1.1b. I don't have my older Debian(s) at hand as of now
Le 27/03/2019 à 16:09, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit :
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.39:
[ ] +1: It's not just good,
> Am 29.03.2019 um 13:55 schrieb Eric Covener :
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:10 AM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>>
>> Hi, all;
>>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:10 AM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.39:
> [ x] +1:
On 3/28/19 11:48 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:10 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
>> candidate tarball as 2.4.39:
>
> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>
> All tests pass on Debian(s) 8, 9 and 10
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:10 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.39:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
All tests pass on Debian(s) 8, 9 and 10 w/ openssl(s) 1.0.2, 1.1.0 and 1.1.1.
Sigs and
sendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 14:52
> An: httpd
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
>
> Yep, CentOS5. Mostly due to the fact that regressions would likely show up
> more readily on older OSs rather than newer ones.
>
> Plus, there's still a crap-ton of systems us
What pcre lib did you use on CentOS5? The one provided by CentOS or your own?
Regards
Rüdiger
C2 General
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 14:52
An: httpd
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
Yep, CentOS5. Mostly due to the fact that regressions would likely show
>
> C2 General
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Jim Jagielski
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 13:39
>> An: httpd
>> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 27, 2019, at 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri
>
C2 General
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Dennis Clarke
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 14:23
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
>
> On 3/28/19 8:51 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
> >
> >
On 3/28/19 8:51 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> Tested and passed on the following systems (no regressions):
>>
>> o macOS 10.14.4, Xcode 10.2
>> o CentOS 5, 64bit
>
> Really CentOS 5? Just asking because it does not receive further OS updates
> and I wouldn't
C2 General
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jim Jagielski
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 13:39
> An: httpd
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
>
>
> > On Mar 27, 2019, at 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> On Mar 27, 2019, at 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball as 2.4.39:
> [ ]
> Am 27.03.2019 um 16:09 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri :
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball as 2.4.39:
> [ ] +1:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:28 PM Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> On 3/27/19 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> > Hi, all;
> >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> Since there is now a release tarball can we have a week to
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:09:52AM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball as 2.4.39:
>
On 3/27/19 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
Since there is now a release tarball can we have a week to test?
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.39:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ]
26 matches
Mail list logo