It works, finds just x and goes happily on its way past it as it should.
cd ..\dbm
for %d in ( x) do if not %d == x NMAKE -f apr_dbm_%d.mak
CFG="apr_dbm_%d - Win32 Release" RECURSE=0
C:\build\httpd-2.2.x-dev\srclib\apr-util\dbm>if not x == x NMAKE -f
apr_dbm_x.mak CFG="apr_dbm_x - Win32 Rele
Well, on any day I would normally say "ok, it's this quirky machine,"
but not on this. This happened to someone else as well. Both on VC6 and 9.
Modern cmd.exe shells? XP SP3 or is it Vista? This is XP SP2 I am using.
I've thought some on it as well since and I can think of possibly a
better app
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>> +/-1
>>> [+1] Release httpd-2.2.13 as GA
>>
>> This is looking fine on windows, is up at /dev/dist as -src-win32,
>> and binaries will follow in the morning.
>
> non-binding +9/10 on Windows. Please see PR 47659 for the last 1/10.
> This
Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
> This was a simple (irritatingly simple) issue fixed on /dev/dist/ now,
> with new 2.2.13 packages. The 2.2.12 package was not refreshed and
> has been rm'ed, but that deletion doesn't show up for a day.
>
> Looks like this is revived and ready, thanks for che
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Tarballs at /dev/dist/; due to the potential security impact on third
> party modules, and my own personal schedule, we'll run this vote for
> 48 hours and see where it stands. Windows src.zip to follow shortly.
>
> +/-1
> [ ] Release httpd-2.2.13 as GA
Waitin
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> this does not work with 2.2.13 msi - see snapshot (tested on W2KSP4)
>
> Interesting; will research, and with luck, repair.
This was a simple (irritatingly simple) issue fixed on /dev/dist/ now,
with new 2.2.13 packages. The 2.2.12 package wa
Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Bill,
> William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
>> The only modulo are the binaries, if one installer works, all four should
>> be fine.
> I usually only extract the msi with:
> msiexec /a apache_2.2..
>
> this does not work with 2.2.13 msi - see snapshot (tested on W2KSP4)
Inter
Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
>>> Windows installer test packages of 2.2.12 and .13 are in the
>>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ dir, but were created on a new machine
>>> and I'd appreciate someone validating them before we take them to the
>>> distribution directory. Thanks!
the .md5 f
Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
> The only modulo are the binaries, if one installer works, all four should
> be fine.
I usually only extract the msi with:
msiexec /a apache_2.2..
this does not work with 2.2.13 msi - see snapshot (tested on W2KSP4)
Gün.
<>
Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Bill,
> William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
>> Windows installer test packages of 2.2.12 and .13 are in the
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ dir, but were created on a new machine
>> and I'd appreciate someone validating them before we take them to the
>> distribution directory
Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
> Windows installer test packages of 2.2.12 and .13 are in the
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ dir, but were created on a new machine
> and I'd appreciate someone validating them before we take them to the
> distribution directory. Thanks!
what sense does th
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> +/-1
>> [+1] Release httpd-2.2.13 as GA
>
> This is looking fine on windows, is up at /dev/dist as -src-win32,
> and binaries will follow in the morning.
Windows installer test packages of 2.2.12 and .13 are in the
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ dir, but wer
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
+/-1
[+1] Release httpd-2.2.13 as GA
This is looking fine on windows, is up at /dev/dist as -src-win32,
and binaries will follow in the morning.
non-binding +9/10 on Windows. Please see PR 47659 for the last 1/10.
This is only a build process failure due to a
> +/-1
> [+1] Release httpd-2.2.13 as GA
This is looking fine on windows, is up at /dev/dist as -src-win32,
and binaries will follow in the morning.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 06.08.2009 09:53, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Tarballs at /dev/dist/; due to the potential security impact on third
>> party modules, and my own personal schedule, we'll run this vote for
>> 48 hours and see where it stands. Windows sr
On 06.08.2009 09:53, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Tarballs at /dev/dist/; due to the potential security impact on third
> party modules, and my own personal schedule, we'll run this vote for
> 48 hours and see where it stands. Windows src.zip to follow shortly.
>
> +/-1
> [ ] Release httpd
On 08/06/2009 03:53 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Tarballs at /dev/dist/; due to the potential security impact on third
party modules, and my own personal schedule, we'll run this vote for
48 hours and see where it stands. Windows src.zip to follow shortly.
+/-1
[ +1 ] Release httpd-2.
Tarballs at /dev/dist/; due to the potential security impact on third
party modules, and my own personal schedule, we'll run this vote for
48 hours and see where it stands. Windows src.zip to follow shortly.
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.13 as GA
18 matches
Mail list logo
