"Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Bill Stoddard wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
>>> that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
>>>
>>> ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector
a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental
performa
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: news Im Auftrag von Bill Barker
> Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juni 2007 05:07
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?
>
>
>
>
> Not strictly true, it's just that it's never gr
"Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Bill Stoddard
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2007 15:28
>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
>> Betreff: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?
>>
>>
>> I'm trying to understan
Bill Stoddard wrote:
> I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
> that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
>
> ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector
> a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental
> performance improvement. obtai
On Thu, June 14, 2007 3:27 pm, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
> that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
>
> ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector
> a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Bill Stoddard
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2007 15:28
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: mod_proxy_ajp or mod_proxy_http?
>
>
> I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it
> provides
> that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
>
> ajp13
