Re: ./configure differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x

2014-08-27 Thread Michael Felt
FYI - building and loading all modules in 2.4.x gives a very similar test result. i.e., loading more modules meant getting more errors. Now that I am finally getting to the point that I understand a bit of this I might even start digging for causes. First I want to get PHP builds improved - now tha

Re: ./configure differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x

2014-08-25 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
And I still intend to answer your underlying question :) Many of the elections are about availability, but others are about the experimental nature of a module in one release vs another, or legal complications, e.g. SSL. Michael Felt wrote: >I remember that there are differences, by design. >

Re: ./configure differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x

2014-08-25 Thread Michael Felt
I remember that there are differences, by design. I guess I should not do these tests after midnight - as I just saw that I had commented out the --enable-load-all-modules. You had already shared this wisdom! My apologies. :( On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On

Re: ./configure differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x

2014-08-21 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:55:17 +0200 Michael Felt wrote: > *Please excuse my laziness* - because I am sure there is a way to get > all modules activated in both 2.2.X and 2.4.X - only that they are > slightly different - and I am sure you have documented it somewhere > (and even mentioned it (that t

./configure differences between 2.2.x and 2.4.x

2014-08-08 Thread Michael Felt
*Please excuse my laziness* - because I am sure there is a way to get all modules activated in both 2.2.X and 2.4.X - only that they are slightly different - and I am sure you have documented it somewhere (and even mentioned it (that there are differences such as ...) in passing in previous replies