On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 11:27:27AM +0100, Alexander Lazic wrote:
Hi,
i use the 2.1 tunk ab and have found 2 segfaults, it think.
the first one was easy to find:
in ssl_print_cert_info() the buf is 64 not BUFSIZ
for eg. =X509_NAME_oneline(dn, buf, BUFSIZ);
The second one was not so
Hi,
On Fre 15.04.2005 11:54, Joe Orton wrote:
Thanks for the report, there were three segfaults actually; I've fixed
them on the trunk.
Thanks ;-)
one of the segfaults was because you're using a -c value -n, which
doesn't really make sense; I changed ab to reject that.
Ops, sorry :-(
al ;-)
On Apr 15, 2005, at 4:25 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
one of the segfaults was because you're using a -c value -n, which
doesn't really make sense; I changed ab to reject that.
Ops, sorry :-(
Don't be sorry, it's still a bug. (:
S.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP
Hi,
i use the 2.1 tunk ab and have found 2 segfaults, it think.
the first one was easy to find:
in ssl_print_cert_info() the buf is 64 not BUFSIZ
for eg. =X509_NAME_oneline(dn, buf, BUFSIZ);
The second one was not so easy to find because i'am not very familiar
with the openssl-development.
After
