Re: 2.2.11 mod_include

2009-04-01 Thread Dan Poirier
Lars Eilebrecht l...@eilebrecht.net writes: Torsten Foertsch wrote: [mod_include DATE_LOCAL bug] Is this a known bug? It's probably this one: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39369 I think that's right. It's a test for Joe's fix for 39369, that has only been applied to

Re: 2.2.11 mod_include

2009-04-01 Thread Torsten Foertsch
On Wed 01 Apr 2009, Dan Poirier wrote: Lars Eilebrecht l...@eilebrecht.net writes: Torsten Foertsch wrote: [mod_include DATE_LOCAL bug] Is this a known bug? It's probably this one: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39369 I think that's right.  It's a test for

Re: 2.2.11 mod_include

2009-04-01 Thread Dan Poirier
Torsten Foertsch torsten.foert...@gmx.net writes: On Wed 01 Apr 2009, Dan Poirier wrote: Lars Eilebrecht l...@eilebrecht.net writes: Torsten Foertsch wrote: [mod_include DATE_LOCAL bug] Is this a known bug? It's probably this one:

2.2.11 mod_include

2009-03-31 Thread Torsten Foertsch
Hi, my apache 2.2.11 does not pass the current httpd test framework: t/modules/include.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 88 Failed: 1) Failed test: 67 t/modules/info.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 1 Failed: 1) Failed test: 1 t/modules/rewrite.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 29 Failed: 1) Failed test: 24

Re: 2.2.11 mod_include

2009-03-31 Thread Lars Eilebrecht
Torsten Foertsch wrote: [mod_include DATE_LOCAL bug] Is this a known bug? It's probably this one: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39369 ciao... -- Lars Eilebrecht l...@eilebrecht.net