On 13 Feb 2012, at 3:56 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
Forget to be clear that SSL is still broken.
Expect that 2.4.1 is not got released as GA.
Btw, build with IPv6 apr-1.4.6 apr-util-1.4.1 apr-iconv-1.2.1 pcre-8.21
lua-5.1 libxml2-2.7.8 openssl-1.0.0g zlib-1.2.6
-Original Message-
From: Steffen
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:41
On 2/15/2012 8:12 AM, Steffen wrote:
Forget to be clear that SSL is still broken.
Expect that 2.4.1 is not got released as GA.
And to be more clear for any potential announcement;
1. AcceptFilter data [default] + mod_ssl works
(except when it doesn't - those users who previously had
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:56:28AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only
httpd 2.4.1
On 2/15/2012 8:12 AM, Steffen wrote:
Forget to be clear that SSL is still broken.
Expect that 2.4.1 is not got released as GA.
And to be more clear for any potential announcement;
1. AcceptFilter data [default] + mod_ssl works
(except when it doesn't - those users who previously
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
On 2/15/2012 8:12 AM, Steffen wrote:
Forget to be clear that SSL is still broken.
Expect that 2.4.1 is not got released as GA.
And to be more clear for any potential announcement;
1. AcceptFilter data [default] + mod_ssl works
(except
On 02/13/2012 02:56 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[X] +1: Good to go
Non binding of course.
Few windows glitches, but mostly build related.
Regards
--
^TM
On 2/15/2012 11:39 AM, Steffen wrote:
Blaming (stack) drivers with set to data:
Bug shows when tested with server rated cards from Broadcom and Intel with
old and new certified drivers on clean 2008 R2 and SP1 and XP and with
consumer rated cards like Realtek, and that on quite some
On Monday 13 February 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
it is an http
design issue, seen it nowhere else.
Steffen
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe Jr.
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 7:00 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Steffen
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
On 2/15/2012 11:39 AM, Steffen wrote:
Blaming (stack) drivers
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
On 2/15/2012 11:39 AM, Steffen wrote:
Blaming (stack) drivers with set to data:
Bug shows when tested with server rated cards from Broadcom and Intel with
old and new certified drivers on clean 2008 R2 and SP1 and XP and with
consumer rated cards like
On 2/15/2012 10:00 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
When any one of these were incorrectly implemented by a network stack
driver, DisableWin32AcceptEx (and now AcceptFilter none) was necessary
to work around the broken driver. That feature has always been a gross
hack around what should just
On 2/15/2012 2:08 PM, Steffen wrote:
Ever contacted the owners of a network stack driver, like Microsoft, Intel
and Broadcom ?
No. I have never encountered the bug, myself. Of course, I disable
all MS QoS magic, and won't tolerate spyware living on the network
layer, but to each their own.
On 2/15/2012 2:49 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
How did timing issues not affect the old hack, and why not use the old
known to work
hack for at least AcceptFilter none, up until some better fix is found? If
that fix is
found and cannot be implemented till 2.next, then 2.next it is.
That
On 2/13/2012 5:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
[X] +1: Good to go, with noted exception of remaining AcceptFilter issue
non-binding of course
Builds fine in IDE for me, tested on XP Vista x86.
Builds fine in IDE (without crypto
] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
On 2/15/2012 2:08 PM, Steffen wrote:
Ever contacted the owners of a network stack driver, like Microsoft, Intel
and Broadcom ?
No. I have never encountered the bug, myself. Of course, I disable
all MS QoS magic, and won't tolerate spyware living on the network
layer
On 2/15/2012 3:16 PM, Steffen wrote:
You are suggesting now that QoS and/and Spyware is the cause. None of that
here, plain
server.
Repeat:
I still think:
Hardly believe that it is a driver problem, I guess more it is an ASF
design issue, seen it nowhere else for all that years.
I
On 13.02.2012 14:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
of the official release.
[X] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
Running Apache Lounge now with 2.4.1 Win32, so far so good.
Not using SSL, still have 2.2.22 with SSL in front as workaround.
Shall keep an eye on all, special the hanging L workers.
Steffen
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 2:56 PM Newsgroups
On Monday 13 February 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Montag, 13. Februar 2012 08:20
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1
Lame mathematician joke: 2.4 at 2^4 (16th Apache birthday).
Regards,
Rainer
On 02/13/2012 04:55 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/12/2012 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Note that I have used VC 6.0 + Server 2003R2 PSDK and
build directly from .dsw/.dsp files.
Also I used pcre sources from old httpd (the cmake build just sucks
and I cannot make that working on windoze).
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:55, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
PR 52402 works for me, not with the configuration in the PR, but these
errors are gone
As long as I point BalancerMember to other machines, it works just fine
I have the same now using an external server. With the localhost
As I currently a svn client I would appreciate a downloadable something
that I can apply my build scripts too. They complete now, (will update
different thread shortly) so I would like to verifythem all asap for the
2.4.1.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Mario Brandt jbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On 13 Feb 2012, at 2:48 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
As I currently a svn client I would appreciate a downloadable something
that I can apply my build scripts too. They complete now, (will update
different thread shortly) so I would like to verifythem all asap for the
2.4.1.
All development
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
On 13.02.2012 14:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier
On 2/13/2012 1:07 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/13/2012 04:55 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/12/2012 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Note that I have used VC 6.0 + Server 2003R2 PSDK and
build directly from .dsw/.dsp files.
Also I used pcre sources from old httpd (the cmake build just sucks
and I
:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
Builds fine on slackware, though, I did find it mildly amusing I had to
rebuild PHP.
Never had to do that before, not even with 2.4.0
root@fox:/usr/local/src/httpd-2.4.1# /etc/rc.d/rc.httpd start
httpd: Syntax error on line 55 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Module /usr/local/src/php
On 2/13/2012 7:07 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
Builds fine on slackware, though, I did find it mildly amusing I had to
rebuild PHP.
Never had to do that before, not even with 2.4.0
If you didn't have to rebuild mod_php5 between httpd 2.2 and 2.4.0,
that was our (serious) error fixed in 2.4.1. You
httpd 2.2 and 2.4.0,
that was our (serious) error fixed in 2.4.1. You certainly had to
Actually it didn't, and using php 5.3.9 at the time..
But, whilst still using 2.4.0 as of Jan 18 13:21 ... later rebuilding
php 5.3.10 on Feb 3 15:34 so it was rebuilt with new major, but the
error only
I've been asked to hold off until tomorrow (Monday) morning...
On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
A heads up that I plan to TR 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs...
Why 48hrs? To give people who might either have patches/backports
time to fold them in, as well as give people who may
Bug 52402[1] isn't working yet. I wonder why it is marked as fixed in
2.4.x CHANGES[2] The shared memory stuff doesn't work yet on windows.
Odd Behavior:
1. If mod_auth_digest is loaded and on Windows Vista/2008/7 do not try
to start from console, it will not start.
2. If mod_heartmonitor is
On 02/12/2012 04:57 PM, Mario Brandt wrote:
Bug 52402[1] isn't working yet. I wonder why it is marked as fixed in
2.4.x CHANGES[2] The shared memory stuff doesn't work yet on windows.
Odd Behavior:
1. If mod_auth_digest is loaded and on Windows Vista/2008/7 do not try
to start from console, it
On 2/12/2012 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/12/2012 04:57 PM, Mario Brandt wrote:
Bug 52402[1] isn't working yet. I wonder why it is marked as fixed in
2.4.x CHANGES[2] The shared memory stuff doesn't work yet on windows.
PR 52402 works for me, not with the configuration in the PR, but
Lame mathematician joke: 2.4 at 2^4 (16th Apache birthday).
Regards,
Rainer
A heads up that I plan to TR 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs...
Why 48hrs? To give people who might either have patches/backports
time to fold them in, as well as give people who may not support
a TR time to note their disagreement and provide valid reasons
behind it.
On 09 Feb 2012, at 4:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
A heads up that I plan to TR 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs...
Why 48hrs? To give people who might either have patches/backports
time to fold them in, as well as give people who may not support
a TR time to note their disagreement and provide
:)
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 09 Feb 2012, at 4:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
A heads up that I plan to TR 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs...
Why 48hrs? To give people who might either have patches/backports
time to fold them in, as well as give
with a note about issues on
Windows.
On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Do I dare float the idea of a 2.4.1 TR very soon??
On 02 Feb 2012, at 4:47 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
As I see it, we are still at the point where the stumbling block
is 2.4.x under Windows. All other platforms, that we know of,
seem to be OK now...
How about if we give it until next Monday (Feb 6th) and if
still no progress, we continue
On Jan 31, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
r1233882 should probably be backported, too, but is unrelated.
I agree with the above... This resolves an issue I observed.
On 30.01.2012 21:11, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Do I dare float the idea of a 2.4.1 TR very soon??
I'm done with flodding the list with trivial backports.
Still open are:
A) Testing/Fixing the bucket problems. There were two bugs, and I have
lost the overview, how the fixes are related. One
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 30.01.2012 21:11, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Do I dare float the idea of a 2.4.1 TR very soon??
I'm done with flodding the list with trivial backports.
Still open are:
A) Testing/Fixing the bucket problems. There were two bugs, and I
have
Do I dare float the idea of a 2.4.1 TR very soon??
On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
And there is apachectl, not httpdctl.
Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4 releases?
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:53 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
And there is apachectl, not httpdctl.
Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4 releases?
-0
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:53 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
And there is apachectl, not httpdctl.
Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4 releases?
No... Maybe that's a consideration for 3.stable-release, if at
On 30.01.2012 22:53, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
And there is apachectl, not httpdctl.
Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4 releases?
-0.5
Rainer
On Monday 30 January 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
And there is apachectl, not httpdctl.
Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4
releases?
FTR, I am also -0 to this change right now.
101 - 151 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
