Am 03.03.2014 15:44, schrieb Eric Covener:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
>>>
>> i would happily build a RPM for our devel-machines
>> still missing a RC tarball :-(
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Jim i
DirectoryCheckHandler has got my vote/promotion.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
>
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > I'd like to T&R and release 2.4.8 this month... Let&
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
>>
> i would happily build a RPM for our devel-machines
> still missing a RC tarball :-(
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Jim is referring to votes in the STATUS file for backports to
'd like to T&R and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
>> some time to:
>>
>> 1. See what in trunk should really be backported
>> 2. Test and vote in STATUS backports
>>
>> Let's get people excited again about Apache httpd!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Anyone else willing/able to cast some STATUS votes?
On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'd like to T&R and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
> some time to:
>
> 1. See what in trunk should really be backported
> 2. Test and vote in ST
On 19.02.2014 14:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'd like to shoot for a T&R sometime next week...
>
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I'd like to T&R and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
>> some time to:
>>
>&
On 22.02.2014 18:17, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 19.02.2014 14:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'd like to shoot for a T&R sometime next week...
>
> I updated aurora our US server for www.apache.org, the project sites and
> also mail-archives.a.o to 2.4.8 dev svn revision 1570851 plus apr/apu
> head revis
On 19.02.2014 14:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'd like to shoot for a T&R sometime next week...
I updated aurora our US server for www.apache.org, the project sites and
also mail-archives.a.o to 2.4.8 dev svn revision 1570851 plus apr/apu
head revision of their 1.5 branches. Looks good, but only upd
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:45 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> Output from ldd /user/local/bin/httpd ?
My system is up and running and serving https using the system openssl library.
I would like to use my compiled version of openssl if
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:45 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Output from ldd /user/local/bin/httpd ?
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb77a9000)
libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0xb7782000)
libaprutil-1.so.0 => /usr/local/apache2/lib/libaprutil-1.so.0 (0xb775c000)
libexpat.so.1 => /lib/i386-li
Output from ldd /user/local/bin/httpd ?
mod_ssl and aprutil-1.so aught to have the right rpath to resolve. One of
your other libs is bound to openssl, as I warned you before about
libldap/lber.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:50 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> There is no embedded. httpd-2.2 included apr, apr-util. httpd-2.4 by
>> vote of the PMC excluded apr, apr-util, so you might be imagining
>
> Sorry, sloppy terminology: I built h
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:50 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> There is no embedded. httpd-2.2 included apr, apr-util. httpd-2.4 by
> vote of the PMC excluded apr, apr-util, so you might be imagining
Sorry, sloppy terminology: I built httpd with apr and apr-util inside
its tree, i.e., with confi
Nobody else seems to have responded, so here's a ++1!
Good forward progress, and I'll offer a complimentary 2.2 release in
tandem to keep people in sync with regression fixes and security
questions.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'd like to T&R
There is no embedded. httpd-2.2 included apr, apr-util. httpd-2.4 by
vote of the PMC excluded apr, apr-util, so you might be imagining
things. Or RM's are doing some goofy things.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> First insight, did you ./config openssl, or ./config shared? It seems near
No option which I think means static.
> impossible to use static openssl. apr-util configure will fail since
> pkgconfig isn't consulted properly. httpd con
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Dr Stephen Henson
wrote:
>
> On 20/02/2014 02:40, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> > First insight, did you ./config openssl, or ./config shared? It seems near
> > impossible to use static openssl. apr-util configure will fail since
> > pkgconfig
> > isn't consulted
On 20/02/2014 02:40, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> First insight, did you ./config openssl, or ./config shared? It seems near
> impossible to use static openssl. apr-util configure will fail since
> pkgconfig
> isn't consulted properly. httpd configure would also likely fail for
> redundant
> s
First insight, did you ./config openssl, or ./config shared? It seems near
impossible to use static openssl. apr-util configure will fail since
pkgconfig isn't consulted properly. httpd configure would also likely fail
for redundant symbols.
Second insight - apr-util version 1.5 includes openss
On 20/02/2014 02:21, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:11 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> You could try tweaking the deployed /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc file
>> to include -lz in Libs: (just after -ldl), and then re-./configure
>
> I'll first see if I can get a good SSL to
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:11 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> You could try tweaking the deployed /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc file
> to include -lz in Libs: (just after -ldl), and then re-./configure
I'll first see if I can get a good SSL to work. So far no build
problems after I took ou
You could try tweaking the deployed /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc
file to include -lz in Libs: (just after -ldl), and then re-./configure
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:39 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
> > I've noticed that openssl defa
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:39 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> I've noticed that openssl default builds do not necessarily add -lz to the
> lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc when they might be needed. In any case I'm going
> to guess you perhaps hadn't installed the zlib1g-dev package?
No, it's installed.
I've noticed that openssl default builds do not necessarily add -lz to the
lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc when they might be needed. In any case I'm going
to guess you perhaps hadn't installed the zlib1g-dev package?
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Dr Stephen Henson <
shen...@opensslfoundation.com> w
On 20/02/2014 00:24, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Dr Stephen Henson
> wrote:
> ..
>>> checking for OpenSSL version >= 0.9.7... OK
>
>> Well something is wrong there with it indicating OpenSSL version 0.9.7. If
>> you
>> intend to use the FIPS 2.0 module you must use Open
No, it isn't muddying things, this should just work. So you are building
your own openssl. Are you certain your build of ssl and build of httpd and
apr are using the same 32 or 64 bit memory model? That's one obvious
reason where ld will fail. And the zlib, expat and pcre you resolve to
must al
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Odd, there is something going on here. I am wondering if this fails to
I'm sorry for muddying the water.
I originally used the option 'zlib' for configuring openssl-fips and
open ssl. I'm in the process of rebuilding without the zli
On 20/02/2014 00:24, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Dr Stephen Henson
> wrote:
>> On 19/02/2014 23:54, Tom Browder wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dr Stephen Henson
wrote:
> On 19/02/2014 15:08
Odd, there is something going on here. I am wondering if this fails to
resolve zlib libraries? Also don't concern yourself with the 0.9.7 check,
you met it (>=) with 1.0.1. Somehow, it didn't resolve the ssl library
files initially given
adding "-L/usr/local/ssl/lib" to LDFLAGS
setting LIBS to
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Dr Stephen Henson
wrote:
> On 19/02/2014 23:54, Tom Browder wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dr Stephen Henson
>>> wrote:
On 19/02/2014 15:08, Tom Browder wrote:
> I configured httpd-2.4
On 19/02/2014 23:54, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dr Stephen Henson
>> wrote:
>>> On 19/02/2014 15:08, Tom Browder wrote:
I configured httpd-2.4.7 successfully to use mod_ssl:
...
>>> That could be
Tom, please start a new thread, this is a discuss thread for planning a
2.4.8 release. Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Tom Browder
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dr Stephen Henson
> > wrote:
> >> On 19/02/2014 15
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dr Stephen Henson
> wrote:
>> On 19/02/2014 15:08, Tom Browder wrote:
>>> I configured httpd-2.4.7 successfully to use mod_ssl:
>>>
>>> ...
>> That could be user error. The path /usr/local/ssl/fips-2.0 is t
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Dr Stephen Henson
wrote:
> On 19/02/2014 15:08, Tom Browder wrote:
>> I configured httpd-2.4.7 successfully to use mod_ssl:
>>
>> ...
> That could be user error. The path /usr/local/ssl/fips-2.0 is the default
> install location of the FIPS module which isn't a
On 19/02/2014 15:08, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'd like to shoot for a T&R sometime next week...
>>> I'd like to T&R and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
>>> some time to:
>>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'd like to shoot for a T&R sometime next week...
>> I'd like to T&R and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
>> some time to:
>>
>> 1. See what in trunk should really be backported
&
I'd like to shoot for a T&R sometime next week...
On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'd like to T&R and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
> some time to:
>
> 1. See what in trunk should really be backported
> 2. Test and v
> And it's also important to keep Apache httpd-x64 code current with the new
> Windows Server + Visual Studio versions, since that's the most cases I
know
> of around.
Let's not hijack the 2.4.8 T&R thread for yet another round of this topic.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> And it's also important to keep Apache httpd-x64 code current with the new
> Windows Server + Visual Studio versions, since that's the most cases I know
> of around.
Is there a particular problem on that front? Contributions are welcome.
or more Apache httpd backends).
Bing
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:58 PM
To: httpd
Subject: 2.4.8 This Month
I'd like to T&R and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
some time to:
1. See what in
I'd like to T&R and release 2.4.8 this month... Let's all take
some time to:
1. See what in trunk should really be backported
2. Test and vote in STATUS backports
Let's get people excited again about Apache httpd!
41 matches
Mail list logo
