William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Jeff Trawick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 6:36 AM
>
>
>>Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>>the plan is to roll within 48 hours if nothing major breaks (which
>>>can't be fixed in the tag)
>>>
>>It looks like I need to
From: "Jeff Trawick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 6:36 AM
> Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > the plan is to roll within 48 hours if nothing major breaks (which
> > can't be fixed in the tag)
>
> It looks like I need to veto/back-out Martin's change to getnam
Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've tagged 31.
>
> the plan is to roll within 48 hours if nothing major breaks (which
> can't be fixed in the tag)
It looks like I need to veto/back-out Martin's change to getnameinfo()
error reporting down in APR since he apparently didn't have time t
Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've tagged 31.
>
> the plan is to roll within 48 hours if nothing major breaks (which
> can't be fixed in the tag)
>
> so.. please try it out on your machines and yell if something breaks
> if all goes well we'll have another beta on our hands
>
>
>
I've tagged 31.
the plan is to roll within 48 hours if nothing major breaks (which can't
be fixed in the tag)
so.. please try it out on your machines and yell if something breaks
if all goes well we'll have another beta on our hands
..Ian, Aaron, & Justin
