I'll do it, no prob.
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Jim Jagielski=20
> > >=20
> >=20
> > I vote to commit and use that as the continue point for
> > more development :)
>
> Excellent. I will do so tonight German time. C
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jim Jagielski
> >
>
> I vote to commit and use that as the continue point for
> more development :)
Excellent. I will do so tonight German time. Currently I am away from my
development env as you may have noticed from my "nicely" formated
Outlook mai
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Jim Jagielski=20
> > >=20
> >=20
> > Yeah, but we check to see if we're >1 thread, so in prefork,
> > we drop to single connection workers.
>
> Which makes sense to me.
>
To me too. What
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jim Jagielski
> >
>
> Yeah, but we check to see if we're >1 thread, so in prefork,
> we drop to single connection workers.
Which makes sense to me. Why have more than one connection per worker
on a prefork processes that can only handle one request a
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: Jim Jagielski
> > I'm currently trying to trace through exactly how the code is=20
> > trying to "pool" connections. Of course, we're only using=20
> > reslist if we're a threaded MPM...
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jim Jagielski
> I'm currently trying to trace through exactly how the code is
> trying to "pool" connections. Of course, we're only using
> reslist if we're a threaded MPM...
Really? I thought APR_HAS_THREADS is set when the OS supports threads.
I tho
