AW: Should fastcgi be a proxy backend?

2006-03-06 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VIS
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isn't that very unreliable? Why should Unix domain sockets be unreliable? Yeah, that's my question as well. Quite a few people seem to use them... Maybe he is working on an upatched Solaris 10 ;-). Regards Rüdiger

AW: Should fastcgi be a proxy backend?

2006-03-06 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VIS
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We actually have a way to do that, it's the close_on_recycle flag, and I had to turn it on in order to get anything approaching reliability for fastcgi. The problem with just using that is that without some coordination between

AW: Should fastcgi be a proxy backend?

2006-03-06 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VIS
von Garrett Rooney Exactly, the pool of available backends needs to be managed globally, which we don't currently have and it's not clear if that ability would be useful outside of fastcgi. But as connection pools are per worker and not per cluster this problem should also appear in the