AW: AW: mod_proxy_balancer: how to define failover (only)/hot standby behavior?

2006-01-24 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VIS
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jim Jagielski > > > > Maybe it is just me being blind. But I haven't found in the = > > documentation how to disable a BalancerMember. Is this a 'hidden' > > feature? :-) > > > > The balancer-manager does that... well, let's the admin do that. +1

Re: AW: mod_proxy_balancer: how to define failover (only)/hot standby behavior?

2006-01-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VIS?= wrote: > > Maybe it is just me being blind. But I haven't found in the = > documentation > how to disable a BalancerMember. Is this a 'hidden' feature? :-) > The balancer-manager does that... well, let's the admin do that. --

AW: mod_proxy_balancer: how to define failover (only)/hot standby behavior?

2006-01-24 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VIS
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Mladen Turk > > Like said earlier. > > Hot standby already works with mod_proxy balancer. > The 'hot standby' BalancerMember must be initially > 'disabled'. Other members must have 'redirect' option set to Maybe it is just me being blind. But I hav

AW: mod_proxy_balancer: how to define failover (only)/hot standby behavior?

2006-01-24 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VIS
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jim Jagielski > [..cut..] > > > A sort of "warm standby" is something that I had planned to > work into the balancer code post 2.2.1. +1 AFAIK local_worker_only mentioned below does not exist any longer in recent versions of mod_jk, but the recent