Hi,
I have an improvement request to suggest but I would like to first provide
some background to justify it, I apologise for the long email :).
I'm actively using mod_proxy to forward PHP files requests to PHP-FPM. My
current approach is to use a RewriteRule with the 'P' flag because (in most
of
Hi all,
Does anybody has any feedback on the patch ? Any concerns or suggestions?
Thanks!
2014-02-06 16:03 GMT+01:00 ryo takatsuki :
> Hi,
>
> I have an improvement request to suggest but I would like to first provide
> some background to justify it, I apologise for the long email :).
>
> I'm
2014-02-06 ryo takatsuki :
> Hi,
>
> I have an improvement request to suggest but I would like to first provide
> some background to justify it, I apologise for the long email :).
>
> I'm actively using mod_proxy to forward PHP files requests to PHP-FPM. My
> current approach is to use a RewriteRul
>AddHandler might be tricky from security point of view, eg. most of cms
>software
>usually checks only for last extension before writing uploaded files,
>but this AddHandler will also
>pass test.php.jpeg to php which might execute this
Yes, It would be probably safer to use something like:
Hi all,
Any other comments about the patch? I believe it is simple enough and
could ease the migration from mod_php to PHP-FPM (and make use of the
new event mode) with minimal changes to the default configurations.
Could you consider adding it? Pretty please :)
To give more background, at Bitnam
Thx for the patch! Let me take a look... I'm assuming that there's
no real work-around other than the patch itself, right?
On Feb 26, 2014, at 1:47 PM, ryo takatsuki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Any other comments about the patch? I believe it is simple enough and
> could ease the migration from mod_ph
>Thx for the patch! Let me take a look... I'm assuming that there's
>no real work-around other than the patch itself, right?
If there is, we could not find it :) We have been searching for months
and trying different approaches. This is required to work with out of
the box installation of many app
From what I can see, it's pretty useful and I'm not detecting
any errors or issues which would cause a regression. Final
testing will be done by COB today but I expect to fold it
into trunk, while adding some doc info.
On Feb 27, 2014, at 12:19 PM, ryo takatsuki wrote:
>> Thx for the patch! Let
Am 27.02.2014 18:19, schrieb ryo takatsuki:
Thx for the patch! Let me take a look... I'm assuming that there's
no real work-around other than the patch itself, right?
If there is, we could not find it :) We have been searching for months
and trying different approaches. This is required to work
Hi,
That is the first approach we used (in fact, that was how we also
named it, mod_proxy_handler :)). The problem is that we support a lot
of different scenarios, sometimes we bundle our own apache, and
sometimes we use the native one from the system. In the former case,
we are ok with patching A
10 matches
Mail list logo
