At 09:11 AM 1/31/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>>As for your question about polling, if we cycle every second we waste
>>cpu - if we sample every few seconds we lose more log entries etc.
>>If we receive alerts when the otherchild processes die we can react
>>immediately without the extra loops.
>In
So I 've actually spent some time looking at this...
apr_proc_other_child_check() on Unix came first, afaict.
Right you are.
Now we're left with ery simple problem. OC works on Unix today, and
it's broken on Win32. Unix's logic is well exercised by a larger group,
WinNT's by a much smaller
At 04:47 PM 1/30/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>>No, that is working fine. It is whacking it because I modified the code in
>>_check() to do exactly the same thing on Win32 as it does on Unix.
>Humm... perhaps you got the cart before the horse... if i recall correctly, I think
>I created the _c
I am guessing that the windows MPM is whacking the piped logger because
ocr->proc->hproc is somehow hosed.
No, that is working fine. It is whacking it because I modified the code in _check()
to do exactly the same thing on Win32 as it does on Unix.
Humm... perhaps you got the cart
At 12:37 PM 1/30/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>This stuff kinda worked on Windows in the past. I need to dig some but I seem to
>recall that it was basically impossible to do the exact same thing in Windows as you
>do in Unix. The other_child_read in Unix will not (and cannot) work the same way
>
At 01:30 PM 1/30/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>>I belive I've deciphered the "RotateLogs doesn't work for access logs
>>on Windows" Apache 2.0.44 bug. It's actually many bugs in conformance.
>>
>>Finally, it looks like apr_proc_other_child_read is the function we *real
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 02:03 PM 1/30/2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
wrowe wrote:
Finally, it looks like apr_proc_other_child_read is the function we
*really* wanted
to use within the health check. But it seems all of these
apr_proc_other_child
functions are really misdocumented withi
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I belive I've deciphered the "RotateLogs doesn't work for access logs
on Windows" Apache 2.0.44 bug. It's actually many bugs in conformance.
First, rbb's reorg of the WinNT pipe logic (apr/file_io/win32/pipe.c rev 1.46)
causes server/log.c ap_open_piped_log() to cre
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I belive I've deciphered the "RotateLogs doesn't work for access logs
on Windows" Apache 2.0.44 bug. It's actually many bugs in conformance.
First, rbb's reorg of the WinNT pipe logic (apr/file_io/win32/pipe.c rev 1.46)
causes server/log.c ap_open_piped_log() to cre
I belive I've deciphered the "RotateLogs doesn't work for access logs
on Windows" Apache 2.0.44 bug. It's actually many bugs in conformance.
First, rbb's reorg of the WinNT pipe logic (apr/file_io/win32/pipe.c rev 1.46)
causes server/log.c ap_open_piped_log() to create an async (nonblocking)
pi
10 matches
Mail list logo
