Re: Apache + Windows

2003-11-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:34 PM 11/18/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote: >Peter J. Cranstone wrote: > >If I am not mistaken, I seem to recall that TransmitFile() is artifically limited to >serving no more than 10 TCP connections on non server editions of Windows. I've not >actually tried it myself. Not TCP connections. Th

Re: Apache + Windows

2003-11-18 Thread Andrew Mann
Jeff White wrote: From: "Bill Stoddard" Andrew Mann wrote: http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5726.asp "Also, because TransmitFile is geared toward server applications, it is fully functional only on server versions of Windows. On home and professional versions, t

Re: Apache + Windows

2003-11-18 Thread Jeff White
From: "Bill Stoddard" > Andrew Mann wrote: > > > http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5726.asp > > > > "Also, because TransmitFile is geared toward server applications, it is > > fully functional only on server versions of Windows. On home and > > professional versions, there may be o

Re: Apache + Windows

2003-11-18 Thread Jeff White
From: "Bill Stoddard" > Peter J. Cranstone wrote: > > > Bill, > > > > Here is an interesting link to a problem someone encountered running Apache > > on Windows. If he's right there is little hope for Apache to ever run > > properly on newer versions of Windows. > > > > http://grumet.net/weblog/a

Re: Apache + Windows

2003-11-18 Thread Ian Holsman
Jess Holle wrote: In other words, you can choose free, open-source software applications [client or server], but if you want a Microsoft server then you still have to pay for a Microsoft server OS. This makes some sense -- all the more reason for the cost sensitive (among others) to use somethi

Re: Apache + Windows

2003-11-18 Thread Bill Stoddard
Andrew Mann wrote: http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5726.asp "Also, because TransmitFile is geared toward server applications, it is fully functional only on server versions of Windows. On home and professional versions, there may be only two outstanding TransmitFile (or Transmi

Re: Apache + Windows

2003-11-18 Thread Jess Holle
In other words, you can choose free, open-source software applications [client or server], but if you want a Microsoft server then you still have to pay for a Microsoft server OS. This makes some sense -- all the more reason for the cost sensitive (among others) to use something else. -- Jess

Re: Apache + Windows

2003-11-18 Thread Andrew Mann
http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/sampchap/5726.asp "Also, because TransmitFile is geared toward server applications, it is fully functional only on server versions of Windows. On home and professional versions, there may be only two outstanding TransmitFile (or TransmitPackets) calls at a

Re: Apache + Windows

2003-11-18 Thread Bill Stoddard
Peter J. Cranstone wrote: Bill, Here is an interesting link to a problem someone encountered running Apache on Windows. If he's right there is little hope for Apache to ever run properly on newer versions of Windows. http://grumet.net/weblog/archives/2003/11/18/questions_about_windows_apache. htm

Apache + Windows

2003-11-18 Thread Peter J. Cranstone
Bill, Here is an interesting link to a problem someone encountered running Apache on Windows. If he's right there is little hope for Apache to ever run properly on newer versions of Windows. http://grumet.net/weblog/archives/2003/11/18/questions_about_windows_apache. html Regards, Peter