On Thu, 9 May 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Call for comments
>
> Apache History Project
>
> We are a few people that are of the opinion that saving a piece of
> history is very important. That is why we have drafted this call for
> comments. We want to save as much of Apache's history as possible.
>
Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> Well, the almost-complete lack of any response has made us wonder if our
> initial note got lost somewhere. Anyways, a brief follow-up. If nobody
> thinks that this is a terrible idea, we'd like to go forward with it,
>
+1. I think it's a great idea... I'd like to propo
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:16:48PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> >
> > Well, the almost-complete lack of any response has made us wonder if our
> > initial note got lost somewhere. Anyways, a brief follow-up. If nobody
> > thinks that this is a terrible idea, we'd like to
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 09:23:58AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:16:48PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > +1. I think it's a great idea... I'd like to propose it as an
> > ASF (sub)project.
>
> +1 from me too.
+1
Tony.
+1
> On Thu, 9 May 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > Call for comments
> >
> > Apache History Project
> >
> > We are a few people that are of the opinion that saving a piece of
> > history is very important. That is why we have drafted this call for
> > comments. We want to save as much of Apache's
Re: Apache History project, several folks wrote:
> +1
Well, this is very promising. The first thing we'd really like is a
mailing list. What's the SOP for getting one created? Or is there
something else that needs to happen before that can be done?
I figure we should get moving while we're moti
> Well, this is very promising. The first thing we'd really like is a
> mailing list. What's the SOP for getting one created? Or is there
> something else that needs to happen before that can be done?
>
> I figure we should get moving while we're motivated, before real life
> intrudes.
Should we
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 04:46:58PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> Should we make this part of the Docs project, and then if it starts
> generating enough traffic it can be moved to its own list?
+1. -- justin
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > Well, this is very promising. The first thing we'd really like is a
> > mailing list. What's the SOP for getting one created? Or is there
> > something else that needs to happen before that can be done?
> >
> > I figure we should get moving while we'r
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:47:52PM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > > Well, this is very promising. The first thing we'd really like is a
> > > mailing list. What's the SOP for getting one created? Or is there
> > > something else that needs to happen bef
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 07:24:22PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 09:23:58AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 12:16:48PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > >
> > > +1. I think it's a great idea... I'd like to propose it as an
> > > ASF (sub)project.
> >
>
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
> Full list of posters with more than 10 posts can be found at:
> http://stderr.net/history/topposters
cool, now i am tied with ben hyde.
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
>
> > Full list of posters with more than 10 posts can be found at:
> > http://stderr.net/history/topposters
>
> cool, now i am tied with ben hyde.
haha, now i am 1 ahead of ben hyde, i'm #32 woohoo!
]
San Francisco, CA
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Apache History Project - Call for comments
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
>
>
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:30:49PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
> >
> > > Full list of posters with more than 10 posts can be found at:
> > > http://stderr.net/history/topposters
> >
> > cool, now i
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 15 May 2002, Thomas Eibner wrote:
> >
> > > Full list of posters with more than 10 posts can be found at:
> > > http://stderr.net/history/topposters
> >
> > cool, now i am tied with ben hyde.
>
> haha
Thomas Eibner wrote:
> One volunteer has already come forward to help us gather data and we've
> compiled some statistics from this mailinglist showing how many posts
> each person has made since '95:
>
> Total Posts on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 87510
>
> 1: ...
This comes up from time to tim
Ben Hyde wrote:
>
> Thomas Eibner wrote:
> > One volunteer has already come forward to help us gather data and we've
> > compiled some statistics from this mailinglist showing how many posts
> > each person has made since '95:
> >
> > Total Posts on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 87510
> >
> > 1:
> Ben Hyde wrote:
> >
> > Thomas Eibner wrote:
> > > One volunteer has already come forward to help us gather data and we've
> > > compiled some statistics from this mailinglist showing how many posts
> > > each person has made since '95:
> > >
> > > Total Posts on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 87510
>
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:56:38AM -0400, Ben Hyde wrote:
> This comes up from time to time. Somebody measures something; bugs
> submitted, bugs fixes, lines written, commits made, documents written,
> mails send, bylaws written, meetings attended, email threads started,
> email threads ended, us
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Ben Hyde wrote:
> Thomas Eibner wrote:
> > One volunteer has already come forward to help us gather data and we've
> > compiled some statistics from this mailinglist showing how many posts
> > each person has made since '95:
> >
> > Total Posts on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 8751
Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
> > Ben Hyde wrote:
> > >
> > > Thomas Eibner wrote:
> > > > One volunteer has already come forward to help us gather data and we've
> > > > compiled some statistics from this mailinglist showing how many posts
> > > > each person has made since '95:
> > > >
> > > > To
At 5:15 AM +0200 5/15/02, Thomas Eibner wrote:
>
>Apache httpd Release timeline
> * Release Date
> * Changelog / Release notes
> * Tarball
> * Usage statistics
> * Other Important Release informaton
> Version
> Release Manager
> Security Fixes
> New Directives
> Chang
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:33:00AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Also useful, I think, would be a description of how the actual
> coding environment changed, from people submitting patches and one
> person being responsible for folding them into the code, the
> "3 +1s" required for a patch to be i
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Personally I'd rather see more effort put towards fixing tomorrow's code
> than dwelling on code and processes from years ago.
One of the important roles that Apache plays, apart from being a damned
fine product, is as a model of how open software dev
Thomas Eibner wrote:
> I agree, what I was more interested in was actually the sheer volume of
> the mailinglist archive.
I've graphed volume (particularly in CVS's logging) over time, that's an
interesting way to keep an ear to the railroad tracks.
> These statistics weren't created for so
26 matches
Mail list logo
