Re: Apache Worm

2002-07-02 Thread Graham Leggett
Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Nope... I believe Dirk is referring to the fact that that is ONE of the > exploits, but there are some others coming around... :( :( :( There is hope though. As the exploit exists at the hop-by-hop level, and because a significant portion of port 80 of the internet is hi

Re: Apache Worm

2002-07-01 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Jon Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 11:24:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: >> >>> Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> I assume

Re: Apache Worm

2002-07-01 Thread Jon Travis
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 11:24:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > > Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I assume everyone has seen this? > > > > > > http://dammit.lt/ap

Re: Apache Worm

2002-06-30 Thread dirkx
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I assume everyone has seen this? > > > > http://dammit.lt/apache-worm/ > > Me and Fede are running through the decompiled assembly code right now... > Will let yo

Re: Apache Worm

2002-06-30 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I assume everyone has seen this? > > http://dammit.lt/apache-worm/ Me and Fede are running through the decompiled assembly code right now... Will let you know what we find out (it looks kinda odd from the look of it). Pier --