Re: Apache adding content-type to responses without one

2002-03-08 Thread Graham Leggett
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > I disagree entirely. You should be -able- to do so, without being forced > to do so. > > The simple fix is not to define the default content type in the root of > the directive. However, there seems no 'trivial' way to do so, > unless would accomplish this. >

Re: Apache adding content-type to responses without one

2002-03-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
I disagree entirely. You should be -able- to do so, without being forced to do so. The simple fix is not to define the default content type in the root of the directive. However, there seems no 'trivial' way to do so, unless would accomplish this. If we don't support a 'none' option to the d

Apache adding content-type to responses without one

2002-03-02 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, Recently someone noted that certain parts of Ebay didn't work via mod_proxy. This was because the pages in question had no content-type header, and Apache was adding a default header "text/plain", which caused browsers to display the source of the page. The resulting discussion said that