> In a message dated 01-09-05 16:14:01 EDT, Kevin Kiley wrote... > > > This is news to me, and certainly no permission has been > > given to either Compaq nor Covalent to call anything a > > 'Compaq Apache server.' I am on the ASF board and I > > can tell you this has not come before us. > > Actually... it's called the 'Covalent Apache Web Server'. > There isn't anything in your board meeting minutes that > authorizes that, either. > > Not complaining... just pointing out a fact. > I am with Peter on this. More power to them. > > Randy Terbrush hasn't appeared here for awhile but there > is no question he should benefit financially from his early > work with Apache. Ryan and Dirk and Harrie and Doug and > Daniel and Jon and Bill Wrowe ( others?... Apache contibutors > all ) deserve the same. I hope they all get to buy their own > private island following the recent Compaq deal the timing of > which was perfect since the valuation of the jsut announced > Compaq and Hewlett-Packet merger is in the neighborhood > of 25 BILLION ( With a B ) dollars. > > Again... more power to all. > Randy and William Rowe alone have busted their ASSES > trying to give you 2.0. I hope they both get private jets > out of the deal. > > Later... > Kevin Kiley Errata... Sorry about that... what I meant to say was... > Ryan Bloom and William Rowe alone have busted their ASSES > trying to give you 2.0. I hope they both get private jets > out of the deal. I am sure Randy Terbrush ( founder and CTO of Covalent ) has worked JUST as hard as anyone else to make Covalent what it is today and secure the Compaq deal and to forward the progress of Apache 2.0 but I specifically meant to mention 'Ryan and William'. Yours... Kevin