On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 21:35 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Needs a comment in the source about why we're using
> volatile here, but otherwise +1.
Ah, yes... Sorry. I also need to fix up the comment in the CHANGES file.
--
Bojan
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 02:34 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Seems to be Fedora Core X specific.
Yeah, very possible.
> Should we figure out how to re-write the loop so it doesn't matter,
> add a prereq check in build/version_check.pl, or just leave it ?
I maintain Fedora Extras libapreq2 pac
Bojan Smojver wrote:
Quoting Joe Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At least now it's a bit clearer why the no-strict-aliasing
optimization is getting confused ;-)
Hey, speak for yourself ;-)
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
gcc version 4.1.2 20060526 (prerelease)
gcc version 3.4.4 20050518
default maintain
