From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 2:39 AM
New Revision: 152973
[...]
+/* RFC 2616 10.3.5 states that entity headers are not supposed
+ * to be in the 304 response. Therefore, we need to load in the
+ * cached headers
--On Wednesday, February 9, 2005 10:47 AM +0100 Sander Striker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
+/* RFC 2616 10.3.5 states that entity headers are not supposed
+ * to be in the 304 response. Therefore, we need to load in the
+ * cached headers before we update the cached
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:20 PM
[...]
Hence, the response headers from the origin server on a 304 response aren't
guaranteed to be complete. So, what this commit does now is load in the
stored cached response headers and