@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Dear all,
I just want to ping on both of these two patches to see if there is anything we
can do to help them get accepted.
Your feedbacks and comments are very much appreciated.
Thanks,
Yingqi Lu
From
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Dear all,
Based on the feedback we received, we modified this patch. Here is the most
recent version. We also modified the Bugzilla database(Bugzilla# 55897 for
SO_REUSEPORT patch; Bugzilla
AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
On Tuesday 04 of March 2014, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> For the configure-time check for 3.9 kernel: I think we'd also use
> AC_TRY_COMPILE at configure time to confi
On Tuesday 04 of March 2014, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> For the configure-time check for 3.9 kernel: I think we'd also use
> AC_TRY_COMPILE at configure time to confirm that the SO_REUSEPORT
> definition is available, and not enable it if the system includes doesn't
> define it. (Does that cause a pro
t it does
* APLOGNO(9) and comments about fixing it: Instead put "APLOGNO()" and
don't add reminders in comments
* this doesn't seem portable: "int free_slots[MAX_SPAWN_RATE/num_buckets];"
and so on
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, February 24, 20
d put "APLOGNO()" and
don't add reminders in comments
* this doesn't seem portable: "int free_slots[MAX_SPAWN_RATE/num_buckets];"
and so on
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yingqi
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lu, Yingqi
> *Sent:* Monday, February 24, 20
:37 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Thanks very much, Jeff!
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:36 AM
To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
Subject: Re
Hi Jeff,
I am just checking if you got chance to check this?
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:37 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
Thanks very much, Jeff!
Thanks,
Lucy
From
Thanks very much, Jeff!
Thanks,
Lucy
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:36 AM
To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch with SO_REUSEPORT
support
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Lu
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and
>> comments. Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Yin
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and
> comments. Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yingqi
>
Hi Yinqqi,
I'm sorry that nobody has responded yet. I'll try
Hi All,
I just want to ping again on this patch to gather your feedback and comments.
Please refer to the messages below for patch details.
Thanks,
Yingqi
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 11:13 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH ASF bugzilla# 55897]prefork_mpm patch
12 matches
Mail list logo
