On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:08:08AM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
> My proposed solution is to review the patch and apply it to cvs HEAD. Get it
> committed. Of course there are no test suites right now, and there won't be
> for a little while yet. But once the code exists, it will be simpler to kee
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 8:08 AM
> At 11:46 AM 10/15/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [snip]
> >The second is SSL upgrade. I have the patches, they haven't been
> >committed yet. I have attached them at the bottom of this message
At 11:46 AM 10/15/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
>The second is SSL upgrade. I have the patches, they haven't been
>committed yet. I have attached them at the bottom of this message. The
>reason they haven't been committed, is that I don't have a client to test
>them with, and I haven't h
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The first project is the Perchild MPM. It basically works, but there are
> > bugs.
The module works for simple cases. However, I have seen a couple of bugs:
1) The second r
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first project is the Perchild MPM. It basically works, but there are
> bugs.
Can you give some more information?
I'm interested in using the Perchild MPM myself, but haven't because of
the reports that it's buggy.
I'm w
The recent conversations on this list have made me finally realize that I
have been here too long. I need a project that is not the Apache web
server. So, this is my good-bye. I will be unsubscribing from the Apache
web server development lists in the next day or two. I will still be
involved
