William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>Brane, I am certain you experienced an anomaly, perhaps a broken
>version of rebase.exe. I say this, having compared the sizes of the
>Apache 2.0.44 distributed iconv tree to the latest *release* build of
>the same. (Or perhaps you were looking at *debug* builds.)
>
Brane, I am certain you experienced an anomaly, perhaps a broken
version of rebase.exe. I say this, having compared the sizes of the
Apache 2.0.44 distributed iconv tree to the latest *release* build of
the same. (Or perhaps you were looking at *debug* builds.)
In any case, don't expect a change
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>After spending many hours reviewing and actively using debug symbols
>for real customer incidents, I have formed some different opinions and
>wanted to share.
>
>I'm convinced that with the Win32 debugging tools (free to download)
>available today, there is exactly on
After spending many hours reviewing and actively using debug symbols
for real customer incidents, I have formed some different opinions and
wanted to share.
I'm convinced that with the Win32 debugging tools (free to download)
available today, there is exactly one benefit to .dbg files - Dr. Watso
