RE: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-13 Thread Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
:-) -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] Sent: Montag, 13. Februar 2012 08:20 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1 Lame mathematician joke: 2.4 at 2^4 (16th Apache birthday). Regards, Rainer

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-13 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/13/2012 04:55 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 2/12/2012 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Note that I have used VC 6.0 + Server 2003R2 PSDK and build directly from .dsw/.dsp files. Also I used pcre sources from old httpd (the cmake build just sucks and I cannot make that working on windoze).

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-13 Thread Mario Brandt
Hi, On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:55, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote: PR 52402 works for me, not with the configuration in the PR, but these errors are gone As long as I point BalancerMember to other machines, it works just fine I have the same now using an external server. With the localhost

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-13 Thread Michael Felt
As I currently a svn client I would appreciate a downloadable something that I can apply my build scripts too. They complete now, (will update different thread shortly) so I would like to verifythem all asap for the 2.4.1. On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Mario Brandt jbl...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-13 Thread Graham Leggett
On 13 Feb 2012, at 2:48 PM, Michael Felt wrote: As I currently a svn client I would appreciate a downloadable something that I can apply my build scripts too. They complete now, (will update different thread shortly) so I would like to verifythem all asap for the 2.4.1. All development

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-13 Thread Gregg Smith
On 2/13/2012 1:07 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 02/13/2012 04:55 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 2/12/2012 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Note that I have used VC 6.0 + Server 2003R2 PSDK and build directly from .dsw/.dsp files. Also I used pcre sources from old httpd (the cmake build just sucks and I

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
I've been asked to hold off until tomorrow (Monday) morning... On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: A heads up that I plan to TR 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs... Why 48hrs? To give people who might either have patches/backports time to fold them in, as well as give people who may

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-12 Thread Mario Brandt
Bug 52402[1] isn't working yet. I wonder why it is marked as fixed in 2.4.x CHANGES[2] The shared memory stuff doesn't work yet on windows. Odd Behavior: 1. If mod_auth_digest is loaded and on Windows Vista/2008/7 do not try to start from console, it will not start. 2. If mod_heartmonitor is

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-12 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/12/2012 04:57 PM, Mario Brandt wrote: Bug 52402[1] isn't working yet. I wonder why it is marked as fixed in 2.4.x CHANGES[2] The shared memory stuff doesn't work yet on windows. Odd Behavior: 1. If mod_auth_digest is loaded and on Windows Vista/2008/7 do not try to start from console, it

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-12 Thread Gregg Smith
On 2/12/2012 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 02/12/2012 04:57 PM, Mario Brandt wrote: Bug 52402[1] isn't working yet. I wonder why it is marked as fixed in 2.4.x CHANGES[2] The shared memory stuff doesn't work yet on windows. PR 52402 works for me, not with the configuration in the PR, but

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-12 Thread Rainer Jung
Lame mathematician joke: 2.4 at 2^4 (16th Apache birthday). Regards, Rainer

Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
A heads up that I plan to TR 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs... Why 48hrs? To give people who might either have patches/backports time to fold them in, as well as give people who may not support a TR time to note their disagreement and provide valid reasons behind it.

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-09 Thread Graham Leggett
On 09 Feb 2012, at 4:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: A heads up that I plan to TR 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs... Why 48hrs? To give people who might either have patches/backports time to fold them in, as well as give people who may not support a TR time to note their disagreement and provide

Re: Intent to TR 2.4.1

2012-02-09 Thread Michael Felt
:) On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 09 Feb 2012, at 4:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: A heads up that I plan to TR 2.4.1 within the next 48hrs... Why 48hrs? To give people who might either have patches/backports time to fold them in, as well as give